ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2020
Technical note: sensitivity analysis of the SCoRE and SARA methods for determining rotational axes during tibiofemoral movements using optical motion capture.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concurrent Validity and Reliability Between Noraxon Ultium™ IMU and Vicon OMC for Lower Limb Gait Assessment Across Variable Walking Speeds.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Muscle fatigue affects dynamic tibiofemoral movements during jumping tasks in healthy participants.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Effects of increasing cognitive demands through expanding movement options on biomechanics during changes of direction in female football players.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Cognitive Dual Task Alters Dynamic Tibiofemoral Movements During Jump-Landing Assessments in Healthy Participants.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- High-demand tasks show that ACL reconstruction is not the only factor in controlling range of tibial rotation: a preliminary investigation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Accurate Prediction of Knee Angles during Open-Chain Rehabilitation Exercises Using a Wearable Array of Nanocomposite Stretch Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The correlation between posterior tibial slope and dynamic anterior tibial translation and dynamic range of tibial rotation.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Copers and Noncopers Use Different Landing Techniques to Limit Anterior Tibial Translation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Sagittal knee kinematics in relation with the posterior tibia slope during jump landing after an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2020Article
- Healthy subjects with lax knees use less knee flexion rather than muscle control to limit anterior tibia translation during landing.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe first aim was to report the sensitivity of calculated tibiofemoral movements for the choice of placement of the set of femoral markers. The second aim was to report the influence of accuracy of the motion captured positions of the markers on the calculated tibiofemoral movements.
methodsTibiofemoral kinematics during single leg hops for distance were calculated. For the first aim, an experiment was conducted in which four different setups of the femoral markers were used to calculated tibiofemoral movements. For the second aim, an experiment was conducted in which all raw marker positions were mathematically moved independently with the known Vicon position error with a distance and in a random direction in each frame, repeated a hundred times. Each time, the tibiofemoral movements were calculated.
resultsThe first experiment yields that the standard deviation of the calculated anterior tibia translation between marker setups was 0.88 mm and the standard deviation of the external tibia rotation between marker setups was 0.76 degrees. The second experiment yields that the standard deviation was 0.76 mm for anterior tibia translation and 0.38 degrees for external tibia rotation.
conclusionA combined standard deviation of both experiments revealed that transients in anterior tibia translation less than 2.32 mm and external tibia rotations less than 1.70 degrees should be taken with caution. These results are 19.42% of the range of the anterior tibia translation and 13.51% of the rotation range during the jump task. The marker setup should be chosen carefully.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.