Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040718›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

Evolution of the imaging features of osteoid osteoma treated with RFA or MRgFUS during a long-term follow-up: a pictorial review with clinical correlations.

Francesco Arrigoni, Federico Bruno, Camilla Gianneramo, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Luigi Zugaro, Carmine Zoccali, Antonio Barile, Carlo Masciocchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Histotripsy Ablation in Preclinical Animal Models of Cancer and Spontaneous Tumors in Veterinary Patients: A Review.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco ArrigoniDepartment of Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy. arrigoni.francesco@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-1872
Federico BrunoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1444-2585
Camilla GianneramoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Pierpaolo PalumboDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1514-0092
Luigi ZugaroDepartment of Emergency and Interventional Radiology, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.
Carmine ZoccaliDepartment of Oncological Orthopaedics, IFO-Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8847-6772
Antonio BarileDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-3583
Carlo MasciocchiDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-0875
University of L'Aquila · ITSan Salvatore Hospital · ITIstituti Fisioterapici Ospitalieri · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interventional radiology is today considered the first-line treatment for osteoid osteoma both in the form of needle-guided technique of ablation (Radiofrequency) and of needleless technique (magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery). The follow-up study of the procedures is mainly clinical, since the disappearance of pain is consistent with the success of the procedure. However, due to the minimally invasive and innovative nature of the approach, interpretation of the follow-up imaging could be ambiguous and misleading. Aim of our review was to define the main findings on the imaging that can best describe the regular evolution of these types of treatment. In particular, four findings were considered: (1) bone marrow oedema; (2) reactive phenomena (perilesional inflammatory reaction for extra-articular lesions or synovial reaction for intra-articular lesions); (3) bone remodelling (disappearance of the nidus and bone healing); (4) ring sign (considered as the granulation tissue around the nidus treated). These findings were evaluated using MRI and CT with a follow-up study that lasted up to 24 months.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiofrequency AblationSurgery, Computer-AssistedBone NeoplasmsCorrelation of DataFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansMaleOsteoma, OsteoidRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsYoung AdultAblation follow-upBone ablationInterventional radiologyMRgFUSOsteoid osteomaRFA

Identifiers

PMID32040718
OpenAlexW3005836371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.