Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040713›Full record

ReviewDevelopment genes and evolution2020

High-throughput sequencing for community analysis: the promise of DNA barcoding to uncover diversity, relatedness, abundances and interactions in spider communities.

Susan R Kennedy, Stefan Prost, Isaac Overcast, Andrew J Rominger, Rosemary G Gillespie, Henrik Krehenwinkel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development genes and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Redescription ofZooKeys · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan R KennedyBiodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology, Onna, Okinawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1616-3985
Stefan ProstLOEWE-Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, Senckenberg Museum, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-3596
Isaac OvercastGraduate Center of the City University New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8614-6892
Andrew J RomingerSanta Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3755-4480
Rosemary G GillespieEnvironmental Sciences Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0086-7424
Henrik KrehenwinkelDepartment of Biogeography, Trier University, Trier, Germany. krehenwinkel@uni-trier.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5069-8601

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KR4623National Science Foundation DEB 1241253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale studies on community ecology are highly desirable but often difficult to accomplish due to the considerable investment of time, labor and, money required to characterize richness, abundance, relatedness, and interactions. Nonetheless, such large-scale perspectives are necessary for understanding the composition, dynamics, and resilience of biological communities. Small invertebrates play a central role in ecosystems, occupying critical positions in the food web and performing a broad variety of ecological functions. However, it has been particularly difficult to adequately characterize communities of these animals because of their exceptionally high diversity and abundance. Spiders in particular fulfill key roles as both predator and prey in terrestrial food webs and are hence an important focus of ecological studies. In recent years, large-scale community analyses have benefitted tremendously from advances in DNA barcoding technology. High-throughput sequencing (HTS), particularly DNA metabarcoding, enables community-wide analyses of diversity and interactions at unprecedented scales and at a fraction of the cost that was previously possible. Here, we review the current state of the application of these technologies to the analysis of spider communities. We discuss amplicon-based DNA barcoding and metabarcoding for the analysis of community diversity and molecular gut content analysis for assessing predator-prey relationships. We also highlight applications of the third generation sequencing technology for long read and portable DNA barcoding. We then address the development of theoretical frameworks for community-level studies, and finally highlight critical gaps and future directions for DNA analysis of spider communities.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAnimalsDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemFood ChainGenomicsPredatory BehaviorSpidersDNACommunity assemblyGut content analysisMetabarcodingPortable sequencingThird generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32040713
PMCPMC7127999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.