Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040698›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2020

The Pathologic Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) Strongly Differs From the Surgical PCI in Peritoneal Metastases Arising From Various Primary Tumors.

Aditi Bhatt, Yutaka Yonemura, Sanket Mehta, Nazim Benzerdjeb, Praveen Kammar, Loma Parikh, Aruna Prabhu, Suniti Mishra, Mita Shah, Sakina Shaikh and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Extent of Disease on Visceral Peritoneal Surfaces of Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasms Controls Survival.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Aditi BhattDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Yutaka YonemuraPeritoneal Metastases Center, Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Sanket MehtaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Nazim BenzerdjebDepartment of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France.
Praveen KammarDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Loma ParikhDepartment of Pathology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Aruna PrabhuDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Thangam Cancer Centre, Nammakkal, India.
Suniti MishraDepartment of Pathology, Fortis Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Mita ShahDepartment of Pathology, Saifee Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Sakina ShaikhDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Vahan KepenekianDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France.
Isabelle BonnefoyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France.
Mahesh D PatelDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Zydus Hospital, Ahmedabad, India.
Sylvie IsaacDepartment of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France.
Olivier GlehenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-sud, Lyon, France. olivier.glehen@chu-lyon.fr.
Hôpital Lyon Sud · FRCadila Healthcare (India) · INSaifee Hospital · INFortis Hospital · INHCG Cancer Centre · INKishiwada Tokushukai Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical peritoneal cancer index (sPCI) is calculated based on a subjective evaluation of the extent of peritoneal disease during surgery. The pathologic PCI (pPCI) may be a more accurate and objective method for determining the PCI. This study aimed to compare the sPCI and pPCI and to study the potential pitfalls and clinical implications of using the pPCI.

methodsThis prospective study (July to December 2018) included all patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS). The pPCI was calculated for each patient and compared with the sPCI. The impact of potential confounding factors on the difference between pPCI and sPCI was evaluated.

resultsAmong 191 patients undergoing CRS at four centers, the pPCI and sPCI were concordant for 37 patients (19.3%). The pPCI was lower than the sPCI for 125 patients (65.4%) and higher for 29 patients (15.1%). The concordance between the two groups was maximum for gastric cancer (38.8%) and colorectal cancer (27.6%) and least for mesothelioma (6.7%) and rare primary tumors (5.6%) (p = 0.04). The difference was 0 to 3 points for 119 patients (62.3%), 4 to 5 points for 27 patients (14.1%), and more than 5 points for 45 patients (23.5%). The rate of concordance was not influenced by the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) (p = 0.4), but the difference was greater when NACT was used (p = 0.03).

conclusionsThe pPCI strongly differs from the sPCI for patients undergoing CRS for peritoneal disease and may provide a more accurate evaluation of the peritoneal disease extent. Further studies are needed to determine its prognostic value compared with sPCI, and consensus guidelines are needed for calculating it.

Indexed as

Peritoneal NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansPeritoneumProspective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID32040698
OpenAlexW3006084451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.