Observational studyMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2021
[Information on medical history in the emergency department : Influence on therapy and diagnostic decisions].
Observational study in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- REAMINAS-A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Completeness of the Emergency Department's Admission Medication and Its Influence on Discharge Medication.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Automated Filtering and Visualization of Patient-Centered Data from Electronic Health Records in Emergency Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- [Availability of patient information in the emergency department : Wish and reality].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2023Article
- Rates of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Mild Head Trauma Patients Presenting to Emergency Department and Their Management: A Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Drugs with Vitamin K Antagonists.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of an electronic health record (EHR) or an emergency care data set (ECDS), as well as reforms in emergency medical care, is currently part of political debate in Germany. Currently, no data are available of how emergency departments could benefit from an ePA or NFD in Germany. The aim of this study was to determine if a patient's medical history has an influence on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in the emergency department. METHODOLOGY: To answer this question, a descriptive observational study was conducted in an interdisciplinary emergency department with a study population of n = 96.
resultsFor 55 patients (59%) neither a doctor's letter nor a drug list was found. However, in 48% of the patients who were admitted to the hospital via the emergency department, additions to the anamnesis record could be identified. Eight (9%) patients showed that therapy and/or diagnostic decisions should have been discussed or changed if the supplemented anamnestic information had been available in the emergency room. In addition, the study revealed that the duration of the anamnesis was prolonged in case of missing medical history (mean: 10-15 min, standard deviation: ±<5 min). In contrast to the patients with a medical history (mean: 5-10 min, standard deviation: ±<5 min).
conclusionBased on the data stored in EHR and ECDS, therapy and diagnostic decisions could be made more reliably. In the absence of a medical history, the time required for medical history taking in emergency departments is significantly longer, which could be reduced by introducing EHR or ECDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.