ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Deep Convolutional Radiomic Features on Diffusion Tensor Images for Classification of Glioma Grades.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Noninvasive Determination ofAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- MANet: a multimodal attention convolutional neural network for brain tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- How gliomas affect white matter tract bundles associated with the limbic cortex.Neuroimage. Reports · 2025Article
- Quality Assessment of MRI-Radiomics-Based Machine Learning Methods in Classification of Brain Tumors: Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Grading of Gliomas by Contrast-Enhanced CT Radiomics Features.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2024Article
- What Matters in Radiological Image Segmentation? Effect of Segmentation Errors on the Diagnostic Related Features.Journal of digital imaging · 2023Article
- Diagnostic value of MRI radiomics in differentiating high‑grade glioma from low‑grade glioma: A meta‑analysis.Oncology letters · 2023Article
- Deep learning in precision medicine and focus on glioma.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Review
- [A Dual-Aware deep learning framework for identification of glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase genotype using magnetic resonance amide proton transfer modalities].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2023Article
- A Survey of Radiomics in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Gliomas.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Diffusion Tensor Imaging Radiomics for Diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Brain Tumor Imaging: Applications of Artificial Intelligence.Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR · 2022Article
- Combining Radiology and Pathology for Automatic Glioma Classification.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Review
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis of Craniopharyngioma.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Review
- Deep learning shows the capability of high-level computer-aided diagnosis in malignant lymphoma.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2020Article
- Radiomics Features PredictFrontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Assessment of the emerging role of AI in diagnosing gliomas using MRI: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The grading of glioma has clinical significance in determining a treatment strategy and evaluating prognosis to investigate a novel set of radiomic features extracted from the fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) maps of brain diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) sequences for computer-aided grading of gliomas. This retrospective study included 108 patients who had pathologically confirmed brain gliomas and DTI scanned during 2012-2018. This cohort included 43 low-grade gliomas (LGGs; all grade II) and 65 high-grade gliomas (HGGs; grade III or IV). We extracted a set of radiomic features, including traditional texture, morphological, and novel deep features derived from pre-trained convolutional neural network models, in the manually-delineated tumor regions. We employed support vector machine and these radiomic features for two classification tasks: LGGs vs HGGs, and grade III vs IV. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity was reported as the performance metrics using the leave-one-out cross-validation method. When combining FA+MD, AUC = 0.93, accuracy = 0.94, sensitivity = 0.98, and specificity = 0.86 in classifying LGGs from HGGs, while AUC = 0.99, accuracy = 0.98, sensitivity = 0.98, and specificity = 1.00 in classifying grade III from IV. The AUC and accuracy remain close when features were extracted from only the solid tumor or additionally including necrosis, cyst, and peritumoral edema. Still, the effects in terms of sensitivity and specificity are mixed. Deep radiomic features derived from pre-trained convolutional neural networks showed higher prediction ability than the traditional texture and shape features in both classification experiments. Radiomic features extracted on the FA and MD maps of brain DTI images are useful for noninvasively classification/grading of LGGs vs HGGs, and grade III vs IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.