Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040668›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2020

The prospective association between frequency of contact with friends and relatives and quality of life in older adults from Central and Eastern Europe.

Eliazar Luna, Milagros Ruiz, Sofia Malyutina, Anastasiya Titarenko, Magdalena Kozela, Andrzej Pająk, Ruzena Kubinova, Martin Bobak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of quality of life (QoL) studies using the CASP scale in older adults.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eliazar LunaResearch Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. eliazar.luna.16@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9892-3791
Milagros RuizResearch Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-9873
Sofia MalyutinaLaboratory of Ethipathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine, 175/1, Borisa Bogatkova street, Novosibirsk, Russia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6539-0466
Anastasiya TitarenkoLaboratory of Ethipathogenesis and Clinics of Internal Diseases, Institute of Internal and Preventive Medicine, 175/1, Borisa Bogatkova street, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Magdalena KozelaInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Grzegórzecka 20, 31-531, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7769-5355
Andrzej PająkInstitute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Grzegórzecka 20, 31-531, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5641-0805
Ruzena KubinovaCentre for Environmental Health Monitoring, National Institute of Public Health, Srobarova 48, 10042, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin BobakResearch Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2633-6851

Funding

CONICYT 72190079CONICYT 73180640European Commission Horizon 2020 grant 530416RAS budget 0324-2018-0001Russian grant RFBR 19-013-00681the PRIMUS Research Programme at Charles University 247054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStudies suggest that frequent contact with friends and relatives promote mental wellbeing in later life, but most evidence comes from Western populations. We investigated the prospective relationship between frequency of contact with friends and relatives and quality of life (QoL) among older Central and Eastern European (CEE) adults and whether depressive symptoms mediated the hypothesised longitudinal relationship.

methodsData from 6106 participants from the Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial factors In Eastern Europe (HAPIEE) study were used. Frequency of contact with friends and relatives was measured at baseline. QoL, at baseline and follow-up, was measured by the Control, Autonomy, Self-realisation, and Pleasure (CASP) 12-item scale. After assessing the prospective association using multivariable linear regression, the mediational hypothesis was tested using path analysis.

resultsThere was a significant prospective association between frequency of contact with friends and relatives and CASP-12 score (0-36) in fully adjusted models. Per every one unit increase in frequency of contact, there was a 0.12 (95% CI 0.06, 0.17) increase in CASP-12 score at follow-up, accounting for sociodemographic, health-related and baseline QoL. Pathway results showed that 81% of the longitudinal effect of frequency of contact on QoL was mediated through depressive symptoms.

conclusionsFrequent contact with friends and relatives improves QoL of older Central and Eastern European adults, partly through buffering against depressive symptoms. Interventions to improve QoL at older ages should incorporate effective management of common mental disorders such as depression.

Indexed as

FriendsQuality of LifeAgedEurope, EasternHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAgeingCentral and Eastern EuropeDepressionOlder agesQuality of lifeSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID32040668
PMCPMC7394932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.