Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040653›Full record

ArticleOdontology2020

Mallampati test with phonation, tongue protrusion and supine position is most correlated with Cormack-Lehane test.

Kentaro Ouchi, Rumiko Hosokawa, Hitoshi Yamanaka, Yasumichi Nakajima, Yuichiro Nakamura, Junji Kishimoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Odontology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kentaro OuchiDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Field of Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan. ken2006anes@yahoo.co.jp.
Rumiko HosokawaDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Field of Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Hitoshi YamanakaDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Field of Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yasumichi NakajimaDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Field of Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Yuichiro NakamuraDepartment of Dental Anesthesiology, Field of Maxillofacial Diagnostic and Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
Junji KishimotoDepartment of Research and Development of Next Generation Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyushu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many modified Mallampati tests have been developed to date. Samsoon's modified Mallampati test (standard Mallampati test) is currently widely used. We newly designed seven types of assessment protocol of Mallampati test, in addition to standard Mallampati test. In this study, we studied the correlation between eight types of protocol (standard and seven alternative protocols) of Mallampati test and Cormack-Lehane test. We newly designed assessment protocols as new Mallampati test. These are different protocols depending on the presence or absence of phonation, those of protrusion of tongue, and sitting position or supine position. The oropharyngeal structures visualized by these eight types of Mallampati test for total of 145 patients undergoing dental oral surgery were evaluated. The scores derived via eight types of Mallampati test were recorded. The influence of phonation, tongue protrusion and body position on Mallampati test score was analyzed, respectively. The relationships between eight types of Mallampati test and Cormack-Lehane test were analyzed. Tongue protrusion, phonation and sitting position tended to lower the score of Mallampati test (p < 0.001, respectively). The standard Mallampati test was not correlated with Cormack-Lehane test. In the new Mallampati tests, assessment protocol with tongue protrusion, phonation and sitting position, that with tongue protrusion and supine position, or that with tongue protrusion, phonation and supine position were significantly correlated with Cormack-Lehane test, respectively. (p = 0.020, p = 0.007 and p = 0.004, respectively). The standard Mallampati test did not correlate with Cormack-Lehane test. Mallampati test with phonation, tongue protrusion and supine position were most correlated with Cormack-Lehane test.

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyHumansOropharynxPhonationSupine PositionAirway managementAnd tracheal intubationCormack–Lehane classificationGeneral anesthesiaMallampati classification

Identifiers

PMID32040653
OpenAlexW3006303343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.