Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040649›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical systems2020

Evidence-Based Strategies in Using Persuasive Interventions to Optimize Antimicrobial Use in Healthcare: a Narrative Review.

Jun Rong Jeffrey Neo, Jeff Niederdeppe, Ole Vielemeyer, Brandyn Lau, Michelle Demetres, Hessam Sadatsafavi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun Rong Jeffrey NeoDepartment of Design and Environmental Analysis, Cornell University, Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. jn458@cornell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8636-9604
Jeff NiederdeppeDepartment of Communication, Cornell University, 476 Mann Library Building, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Ole VielemeyerWeill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Avenue, 4th Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Brandyn LauJohns Hopkins Medicine, Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, 600 North Wolfe Street - Radiology 127, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Michelle DemetresWeill Cornell Medicine, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Hessam SadatsafaviDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, P.O. Box 800699, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rise in antimicrobial resistance, seen especially since 2000, is in part caused by indiscriminate antimicrobial use. Varied types of persuasive interventions aimed to optimize antimicrobial use have been tried with varying success. Our review seeks to identify and assess factors associated with the successful implementation of persuasive interventions. We searched five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and ERIC) to identify critical studies published between 2000 and December 2018 of interventions employing audit and feedback, education through meetings, academic detailing, reminders, and patient, family, or public education. Outcome measures of interest were any means to measure antimicrobial use. We included 26 articles in our analysis. Seventeen examined multimodal interventions and the most common was audit and feedback and meeting (four studies). Nine examined single interventions and the most common was audit and feedback (five studies). Our findings inform four evidence-based strategies to enable healthcare administrators, clinicians, and researchers to make informed choices when planning and designing an antimicrobial stewardship program: (1) implement a combination of persuasive interventions from both groups: audit and feedback, academic detailing, or patient, family, or provider education; and meeting or reminders, (2) design interventions that last one year or longer; post-intervention, assess the intervention's long-term effects for at least another one year, (3) conduct quality improvement projects examining persuasive interventions if the prescribing database provides adequate diagnosis information, and most importantly, (4) make patient, family, or provider education an integral component of multimodal intervention.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsHumansPersuasive CommunicationPractice Patterns, Physicians'Primary Health CareRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic prescriptionAntibiotic resistanceAntibiotic usageAntimicrobial managementAntimicrobial resistancePersuasive interventions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.