Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040634›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2020

Acquisition and Analysis of Electrohysterogram Signal.

Parameshwari R, Shenbaga Devi S

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parameshwari RDepartment of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy Anna University, Chennai, India. eswarifrd05@gmail.com.
Shenbaga Devi SDepartment of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy Anna University, Chennai, India.
Anna University, Chennai · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrohysterogram (EHG) signal is the signal related to action potentials propagating through smooth muscle cells of the uterus (myometrium) to the abdomen of pregnant women which is also known as uterine contraction signal. Cardiotocography (CTG) is the most common method used for monitoring fetal heart rate (FHR) and uterine contractions during pregnancy and labor. This method detects mechanical activity of fetal heart and uterus, however, it provides low accuracy and sensibility and hence more accurate methods are required. The abdominal electrode method of FECG monitoring and Electrohysterography (EHG) are alternative noninvasive method to monitor the FHR and uterine contractions during pregnancy which provides better results compared to CTG. Each information such as the frequency of uterine contractions, length of the contraction and contraction power of uterus, indicates the condition of the uterus which will help the obstetricians to identify the progress of labor. All these above mentioned parameters can be identified from the EHG signal acquired non-invasively by placing the electrodes on the abdomen of the pregnant women. In this work the acquisition of EHG signal as well as analysis of EHG signal in both antepartum condition and labor condition have been carried out and parameters such as number of contractions, contraction duration, amplitude, power of contraction are computed and the quantitative analysis of EHG signals in both above mentioned conditions are performed and it is compared with the simultaneously recorded uterine contraction signal parameters from Cardiotocography (CTG).

Indexed as

ElectromyographyFemaleFetal MonitoringHumansObstetric Labor, PrematurePregnancySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedUterine ContractionUterusCTGEHGFHRRegressionTocographyUterine contraction

Identifiers

PMID32040634
OpenAlexW3006344474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.