Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040574›Full record

Observational studyClinical chemistry2020

A Prospective Evaluation of Point-of-Care Measurements of Maternal Glucose for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Eimer G O'Malley, Ciara M E Reynolds, Ruth O'Kelly, Anne Killalea, Sharon R Sheehan, Michael J Turner

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Performance of point-of-care glucose testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes in South Africa.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eimer G O'MalleyUCD Centre for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ciara M E ReynoldsUCD Centre for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Ruth O'KellyDepartment of Biochemistry, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Anne KillaleaDepartment of Biochemistry, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Sharon R SheehanUCD Centre for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael J TurnerUCD Centre for Human Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Women and Infants University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care (POC) measurement of glucose is currently recommended only for the monitoring of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This prospective observational study evaluated the use of POC measurements of maternal glucose to diagnose GDM in women being screened selectively with a 1-step 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

methodsThe strictest preanalytic and analytic international laboratory standards were applied to measure maternal plasma glucose at fasting and at 1 and 2 h post glucose load. The recent International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups diagnostic criteria were used. At the same time, maternal capillary glucose was measured. Because of differences in plasma and capillary glucose measurements, regression analysis of POC capillary glucose results vs laboratory plasma glucose results was conducted. The regression equations for plasma glucose were derived in a derivation cohort (n = 102). These equations were applied in the validation cohort (n = 100). Predicted and actual plasma glucose values were compared.

resultsOf the 202 women screened, 36.6% were nulliparous, 56.4% were obese, and 81.2% were Irish-born. Two thirds had a single risk factor for GDM, and a third had multiple risk factors. Based on the plasma measurements, 53.5% had GDM. As a predictor of GDM, the diagnostic accuracy of POC measurement was 83.0% (95% confidence interval, 74.2-89.8).

conclusionsIn high-resource settings where measures to inhibit glycolysis are implemented, the use of POC measurements for the diagnosis of GDM is not justified based on this study. In low- and medium-resource settings, where measures to inhibit glycolysis are not achievable, regression analysis using POC measurements may be acceptable compared with plasma samples subject to glycolysis.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseCohort StudiesDiabetes, GestationalFastingFemaleGlucoseGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPoint-of-Care SystemsPoint-of-Care TestingPregnancyProspective StudiesRisk FactorsBlood GlucoseGlucosediagnostic accuracyGestational diabetes mellituspoint- of-care glucosepreanalytical glucose sample handling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.