Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040562›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2020

Baseline reward processing and ventrostriatal dopamine function are associated with pramipexole response in depression.

Alexis E Whitton, Jenna M Reinen, Mark Slifstein, Yuen-Siang Ang, Patrick J McGrath, Dan V Iosifescu, Anissa Abi-Dargham, Diego A Pizzagalli, Franklin R Schneier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02033369 (Ventrostriatal Dopamine Release and Reward Motivation in MDD), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02033369 phase4completednot on this map

Ventrostriatal Dopamine Release and Reward Motivation in MDD

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York State Psychiatric InstituteRan2014 to 2017Enrolled52ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsPramipexole
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Dopaminergic modulation of social reward anticipation in depression: neural effects of amisulpride versus placebo.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. ENX-104: a selective and potent DNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexis E WhittonCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont MA, USA.
Jenna M ReinenIBM TJ Watson Research Center, Computational Biology Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Mark SlifsteinDivision of Translational Imaging, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York NY, USA.
Yuen-Siang AngCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont MA, USA.
Patrick J McGrathDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dan V IosifescuDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Anissa Abi-DarghamDivision of Translational Imaging, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York NY, USA.
Diego A PizzagalliCenter for Depression, Anxiety and Stress Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont MA, USA.
Franklin R SchneierDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USHarvard University · USIBM (United States) · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Neuroimaging Studies of Reward Processing in DepressionR37MH068376 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Diego A Pizzagalli · 2016 to 2026
$7.4M
Ventrostriatal Dopamine Release and Reward Motivation in MDDR01MH099322 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SCHNEIER, FRANKLIN R. · 2013 to 2016
$2.9M
Multi level Analysis of Positive Valence Systems Across Mood DisordersR01MH101521 · NIMH · MCLEAN HOSPITAL · PI PIZZAGALLI, DIEGO A · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH099322NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH101521NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH068376
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of dopamine agonists in treating major depressive disorder has been hypothesized to stem from effects on ventrostriatal dopamine and reward function. However, an important question is whether dopamine agonists are most beneficial for patients with reward-based deficits. This study evaluated whether measures of reward processing and ventrostriatal dopamine function predicted response to the dopamine agonist, pramipexole (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02033369). Individuals with major depressive disorder (n = 26) and healthy controls (n = 26) (mean ± SD age = 26.5 ± 5.9; 50% female) first underwent assessments of reward learning behaviour and ventrostriatal prediction error signalling (measured using functional MRI). 11C-(+)-PHNO PET before and after oral amphetamine was used to assess ventrostriatal dopamine release. The depressed group then received open-label pramipexole treatment for 6 weeks (0.5 mg/day titrated to a maximum daily dose of 2.5 mg). Symptoms were assessed weekly, and reward learning was reassessed post-treatment. At baseline, relative to controls, the depressed group showed lower reward learning (P = 0.02), a trend towards blunted reward-related prediction error signals (P = 0.07), and a trend towards increased amphetamine-induced dopamine release (P = 0.07). Despite symptom improvements following pramipexole (Cohen's d ranging from 0.51 to 2.16 across symptom subscales), reward learning did not change after treatment. At a group level, baseline reward learning (P = 0.001) and prediction error signalling (P = 0.004) were both associated with symptom improvement, albeit in a direction opposite to initial predictions: patients with stronger pretreatment reward learning and reward-related prediction error signalling improved most. Baseline D2/3 receptor availability (P = 0.02) and dopamine release (P = 0.05) also predicted improvements in clinical functioning, with lower D2/3 receptor availability and lower dopamine release predicting greater improvements. Although these findings await replication, they suggest that measures of reward-related mesolimbic dopamine function may hold promise for identifying depressed individuals likely to respond favourably to dopaminergic pharmacotherapy.

Indexed as

RewardAdultDepressionDopamineDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsFemaleHumansLearningMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPramipexoleDopamineDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsPramipexoledepressiondopaminepramipexolereward learningstriatum

Identifiers

PMID32040562
PMCPMC7009463
OpenAlexW3004921223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.