ArticlePloS one2020
Basal ganglia role in learning rewarded actions and executing previously learned choices: Healthy and diseased states.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Striatal and cerebellar interactions during reward-based motor performance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Striatal and cerebellar interactions during reward-based motor performance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The NERD model: reflex circuit dysfunction as a systems-level driver of persistent post-concussion symptoms.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2025Article
- Break-up and recovery of harmony between direct and indirect pathways in the basal ganglia: Huntington's disease and treatment.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- More widespread and rigid neuronal representation of reward expectation underlies impulsive choices.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Correction: Basal ganglia role in learning rewarded actions and executing previously learned choices: Healthy and diseased states.PloS one · 2024Article
- Distinct cortico-striatal compartments drive competition between adaptive and automatized behavior.PloS one · 2023Article
- Phasic Dopamine Changes and Hebbian Mechanisms during Probabilistic Reversal Learning in Striatal Circuits: A Computational Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Neuro4PD: An Initial Neurorobotics Model of Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The basal ganglia (BG) is a collection of nuclei located deep beneath the cerebral cortex that is involved in learning and selection of rewarded actions. Here, we analyzed BG mechanisms that enable these functions. We implemented a rate model of a BG-thalamo-cortical loop and simulated its performance in a standard action selection task. We have shown that potentiation of corticostriatal synapses enables learning of a rewarded option. However, these synapses became redundant later as direct connections between prefrontal and premotor cortices (PFC-PMC) were potentiated by Hebbian learning. After we switched the reward to the previously unrewarded option (reversal), the BG was again responsible for switching to the new option. Due to the potentiated direct cortical connections, the system was biased to the previously rewarded choice, and establishing the new choice required a greater number of trials. Guided by physiological research, we then modified our model to reproduce pathological states of mild Parkinson's and Huntington's diseases. We found that in the Parkinsonian state PMC activity levels become extremely variable, which is caused by oscillations arising in the BG-thalamo-cortical loop. The model reproduced severe impairment of learning and predicted that this is caused by these oscillations as well as a reduced reward prediction signal. In the Huntington state, the potentiation of the PFC-PMC connections produced better learning, but altered BG output disrupted expression of the rewarded choices. This resulted in random switching between rewarded and unrewarded choices resembling an exploratory phase that never ended. Along with other computational studies, our results further reconcile the apparent contradiction between the critical involvement of the BG in execution of previously learned actions and yet no impairment of these actions after BG output is ablated by lesions or deep brain stimulation. We predict that the cortico-BG-thalamo-cortical loop conforms to previously learned choice in healthy conditions, but impedes those choices in disease states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.