Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040513›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Antimicrobial usage at a large teaching hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.

Anne M Masich, Ana D Vega, Patricia Callahan, Amber Herbert, Sombo Fwoloshi, Paul M Zulu, Duncan Chanda, Uchizi Chola, Lloyd Mulenga, Lottie Hachaambwa and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne M MasichVirginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0728-001X
Ana D VegaJackson Health System, Miami, Florida, United States of America.
Patricia CallahanUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Amber HerbertUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Sombo FwoloshiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Paul M ZuluDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Duncan ChandaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Uchizi CholaDepartment of Pharmacy, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lloyd MulengaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lottie HachaambwaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
Neha S PanditUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Emily L HeilUniversity of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Cassidy W ClaassenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity Teaching Hospital · ZMJackson Health System · USMinistry of Health · ZMVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global health concern. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) curbs resistance rates by encouraging rational antimicrobial use. However, data on antimicrobial stewardship in developing countries is scarce. The objective of this study was to characterize antimicrobial use at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia as a guiding step in the development of an AMS program. This was a cross-sectional, observational study evaluating antimicrobial appropriateness and consumption in non-critically ill adult medicine patients admitted to UTH. Appropriateness was defined as a composite measure based upon daily chart review. Sixty percent (88/146) of all adult patients admitted to the general wards had at least one antimicrobial ordered and were included in this study. The most commonly treated infectious diseases were tuberculosis, pneumonia, and septicemia. Treatment of drug sensitive tuberculosis is standardized in a four-drug combination pill of rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol, therefore appropriateness of therapy was not further evaluated. The most common antimicrobials ordered were cefotaxime (n = 45), ceftriaxone (n = 28), and metronidazole (n = 14). Overall, 67% of antimicrobial orders were inappropriately prescribed to some extent, largely driven by incorrect dose or frequency in patients with renal dysfunction. Antimicrobial prescribing among hospitalized patients at UTH is common and there is room for optimization of a majority of antimicrobial orders. Availability of certain antimicrobials must be taken into consideration during AMS program development.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCommunicable DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, TeachingHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPharmaciesPractice Patterns, Physicians'ZambiaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID32040513
PMCPMC7010251
OpenAlexW3005648133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.