ArticlePloS one2020
Simulation of bronchial airway acoustics in healthy and asthmatic subjects.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling Realistic Geometries in Human Intrathoracic Airways.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Body Acoustics for the Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Medical Conditions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The onset and development of many airway pathologies affect sound propagation throughout the respiratory system; changes in respiratory sounds are detected primarily by auscultation, which is highly skill dependent. The aim of the present study was to compare healthy and asthmatic pulmonary acoustics by applying a 1D model of wave propagation on CT-based patient-specific geometries. High-resolution CT lung images were acquired in five healthy volunteers and five asthmatic patients at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC). Tracheobronchial trees were reconstructed from CT images. Acoustic pressure, impedance and wall radial velocity were measured by simulating acoustic wave propagation of two external, acoustic pressure waves (1 Pa, 200 and 600 Hz) from the trachea level to the 4th generation. In asthmatic patients, acoustic pressure averaged across the last three generations showed a reduction equal to 29.7% (p<0.01) at FRC, at 200 Hz; input and terminal impedance were 34.5% (p<0.05) higher both at FRC and TLC; wall radial velocity was more than 80% (p<0.05) lower in higher generations both at FRC and TLC. Airway differences in asthma alter acoustic parameters at FRC and TLC, with the greatest difference at FRC and 200 Hz. Acoustic wave propagation analysis represents a quantitative approach that has potential to objectively characterize airway differences in individuals with diseases such as asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.