Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040327›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2020

Bulk Nanobubbles or Not Nanobubbles: That is the Question.

Ananda J Jadhav, Mostafa Barigou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Innovative COUltrasonics sonochemistry · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Stability and Free Radical Production for CONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Metastable Nanobubbles.ACS omega · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Life at the interface: Engineering bio-nanomaterials through interfacial molecular self-assembly.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ananda J JadhavSchool of Chemical Engineering , University of Birmingham , Edgbaston , Birmingham B15 2TT , U.K.
Mostafa BarigouSchool of Chemical Engineering , University of Birmingham , Edgbaston , Birmingham B15 2TT , U.K.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0850-4011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bulk nanobubbles are a novel nanoscale bubble system with unusual properties which challenge our understanding of bubble behavior. Because of their extraordinary longevity, their existence is still not widely accepted as they are often attributed to the presence of supramolecular structures or contaminants. Nonetheless, bulk nanobubbles are attracting increasing attention in the literature, but reports generally lack objective evidence that the observed nano-entities are indeed nanobubbles. In this paper, we use various physical and chemical analytical techniques to provide multiple evidence that the nano-entities produced mechanically in pure water by a continuous high-shear rotor-stator device or acoustic cavitation and spontaneously by water-ethanol mixing are indeed gas-filled domains. We estimate that the results presented here combined provide conclusive proof that bulk nanobubbles do exist and they are stable. This paper should help close the debate about the existence of bulk nanobubbles and, hence, enable the scientific community to rather focus on developing the missing fundamental science in this area.

Identifiers

PMID32040327
PMCPMC7146852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.