ArticleNMR in biomedicine2020
Resolution-dependent influences of compressed sensing in quantitative T2 mapping of articular cartilage.
Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Femoral Head Articular Cartilage Change in Patients with Hip Osteonecrosis Treated with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Trial
- Review of Quantitative Knee Articular Cartilage MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the resolution-dependent influences of compressed sensing (CS) in MRI quantification of T2 mapping in articular cartilage with osteoarthritis (OA). T2-weighed 2D experiments of healthy and OA cartilage were fully sampled in k-space with five echo times at both 17.6 μm and 195.3 μm in-plane resolutions; termed as microscopic MRI (μMRI) and macroscopic MRI (mMRI) respectively. These fully sampled k-space data were under-sampled at various 2D CS accelerating factors (AF = 4-32). The under-sampled data were reconstructed individually into 2D images using nonlinear reconstruction, which were used to calculate the T2 maps. The bulk and zonal variations of T2 values in cartilage were evaluated at different AFs. The study finds that the T2 images at AFs up to 8 preserved major visual information and produced negligible artifacts for μMRI. The T2 values remained accurate for different sub-tissue zones at various AFs. The absolute difference between the CS (AF up to 32) and the Ground Truth (i.e., using 100% of the k-space data) of the mean T2 values through the whole tissue depth was higher in mMRI versus μMRI. For mMRI (where the resolution mimics the clinical MRI of human cartilage), the quantitative T2 mapping at AFs up to 4 showed negligible variations. This study demonstrates that both clinical MRI and μMRI can benefit from the use of CS in image acquisition, and μMRI benefits more from the use of CS by acquiring much less data, without losing significant accuracy in the quantification of T2 maps in osteoarthritic cartilage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.