Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040208›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2020

Developmental Validation of the ANDE 6C System for Rapid DNA Analysis of Forensic Casework and DVI Samples.

Rosemary S Turingan, Eugene Tan, Hua Jiang, Jessi Brown, Yeshwanthi Estari, Greice Krautz-Peterson, Richard F Selden

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. DNA forensics at forty: the way forward.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Alternative workflows for identifying transnational missing persons.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rosemary S TuringanANDE Corporation, 266 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451.
Eugene TanANDE Corporation, 266 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451.
Hua JiangANDE Corporation, 266 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451.
Jessi BrownANDE Corporation, 266 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451.
Yeshwanthi EstariANDE Corporation, 266 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451.
Greice Krautz-PetersonANDE Corporation, 266 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451.
Richard F SeldenANDE Corporation, 266 Second Avenue, Waltham, MA, 02451.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A developmental validation was performed to demonstrate reliability, reproducibility, and robustness of the ANDE Rapid DNA Identification System for processing of crime scene and disaster victim identification (DVI) samples. A total of 1705 samples were evaluated, including blood, oral epithelial samples from drinking containers, samples on FTA and untreated paper, semen, bone, and soft tissues. This study was conducted to address the FBI's Quality Assurance Standards on developmental validation and to accumulate data from a sufficient number of unique donors and sample types to meet NDIS submission requirements for acceptance of the ANDE Expert System for casework use. To date, no Expert System has been approved for such samples, but the results of this study demonstrated that the automated Expert System performs similarly to conventional laboratory data analysis. Furthermore, Rapid DNA analysis demonstrated accuracy, precision, resolution, concordance, and reproducibility that were comparable to conventional processing along with appropriate species specificity, limit of detection, performance in the presence of inhibitors. No lane-to-lane or run-to-run contamination was observed, and the system correctly identified the presence of mixtures. Taken together, the ANDE instrument, I-Chip consumable, FlexPlex chemistry (a 27-locus STR assay compatible with all widely used global loci, including the CODIS core 20 loci), and automated Expert System successfully processed and interpreted more than 1200 unique samples with over 99.99% concordant CODIS alleles. This extensive developmental validation data provides support for broad use of the system by agencies and accredited forensic laboratories in single-source suspect-evidence comparisons, local database searches, and DVI.

Indexed as

Disaster VictimsMicrosatellite RepeatsAllelesBlood Chemical AnalysisBone and BonesChewing GumDatabases, Nucleic AcidDNADNA FingerprintingFemaleHumansLimit of DetectionMaleMouth MucosaPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsChewing GumDNAANDEdevelopmental validationdisaster victim identificationDNA analysis/testingExpert SystemFlexPlex assayI-ChipQuality Assurance StandardsRapid DNA Identificationshort tandem repeat

Identifiers

PMID32040208
PMCPMC7383818
OpenAlexW3005311445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.