Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32040154›Full record

ArticleNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2020

Identifying critically important cardiovascular outcomes for trials in hemodialysis: an international survey with patients, caregivers and health professionals.

Emma O'Lone, Martin Howell, Andrea K Viecelli, Jonathan C Craig, Allison Tong, Benedicte Sautenet, William G Herrington, Charles A Herzog, Tazeen H Jafar, Meg Jardine and 11 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Heart failure events in randomized controlled trials for adults receiving maintenance dialysis: a meta-epidemiologic study.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Patient-centeredness and the Pareto principle: getting at the matter of what matters to our patients.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Emma O'LoneSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Martin HowellSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Andrea K ViecelliDepartment of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jonathan C CraigCollege of Medicine and Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Allison TongSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Benedicte SautenetDepartment of Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Tours University, Tours, France.
William G HerringtonNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Oxford, UK.
Charles A HerzogDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Hennepin County Medical Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Tazeen H JafarProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.
Meg JardineGeorge Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Vera KraneDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Adeera LevinDivision of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jolanta MalyszkoDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis and Internal Medicine Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland.
Michael V RoccoWake Forest School of Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Giovanni StrippoliSydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Marcello TonelliDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Angela Yee-Moon WangDepartment of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PR China.
Christoph WannerDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Nephrology, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany.
Faiez ZannadUniversité de Lorraine, Inserm CIC 1433 and INI-CRCT, CHU, Nancy, France.
Wolfgang C WinkelmayerSelzman Institute for Kidney Health, Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
David C WheelerDepartment of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R007764/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in people on hemodialysis (HD). Cardiovascular outcomes are reported infrequently and inconsistently across trials in HD. This study aimed to identify the priorities of patients/caregivers and health professionals (HPs) for CVD outcomes to be incorporated into a core outcome set reported in all HD trials.

methodsIn an international online survey, participants rated the absolute importance of 10 cardiovascular outcomes (derived from a systematic review) on a 9-point Likert scale, with 7-9 being critically important. The relative importance was determined using a best-worst scale. Likert means, medians and proportions and best-worst preference scores were calculated for each outcome. Comments were thematically analyzed.

resultsParticipants included 127 (19%) patients/caregivers and 549 (81%) HPs from 53 countries, of whom 530 (78%) completed the survey in English and 146 (22%) in Chinese. All but one cardiovascular outcome ('valve replacement') was rated as critically important (Likert 7-9) by all participants; 'sudden cardiac death', 'heart attack', 'stroke' and 'heart failure' were all rated at the top by patients/caregivers (median Likert score 9). Patients/caregivers ranked the same four outcomes as the most important outcomes with mean preference scores of 6.2 (95% confidence interval 4.8-7.5), 5.9 (4.6-7.2), 5.3 (4.0-6.6) and 4.9 (3.6-6.3), respectively. The same four outcomes were ranked most highly by HPs. We identified five themes underpinning the prioritization of outcomes: 'clinical equipoise and potential for intervention', 'specific or attributable to HD', 'severity or impact on the quality of life', 'strengthen knowledge and education', and 'inextricably linked burden and risk'.

conclusionsPatients and HPs believe that all cardiovascular outcomes are of critical importance but consistently identify sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure as the most important outcomes to be measured in all HD trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCaregiversClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInternational AgenciesMaleMiddle AgedPatientsPrognosisQuality of Lifecardiovascularmyocardial infarctionoutcomessudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID32040154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.