Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039972›Full record

ArticleThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2020

Benchmarking the value of care: Variability in hospital costs for common operations and its association with procedure volume.

Cheryl K Zogg, Andrew C Bernard, Sameer A Hirji, Joseph P Minei, Kristan L Staudenmayer, Kimberly A Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cheryl K ZoggFrom the Department of Surgery (C.K.Z., K.A.D.), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery (C.K.Z., S.A.H.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Surgery (A.C.B.), College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Department of Surgery (J.P.M.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and Department of Surgery (K.L.S.), Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Andrew C Bernard
Sameer A Hirji
Joseph P Minei
Kristan L Staudenmayer
Kimberly A Davis

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007205 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KAZMIERCZAK, BARBARA I · 1985 to 2019
$42.9M
The ED.TRAUMA Study: Evaluating the Discordance ofTrauma Readmission And Unanticipated Mortality in the Assessment of hospital qualityF30AG066371 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZOGG, CHERYL K · 2019 to 2022
$163k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIA NIH HHS F30 AG066371NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to improve health care value (quality/cost) have become a priority in the United States. Although many seek to increase quality by reducing variability in adverse outcomes, less is known about variability in costs. In conjunction with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Healthcare Economics Committee, the objective of this study was to examine the extent of variability in total hospital costs for two common procedures: laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

methodsNationally weighted data for adults 18 years and older was obtained for patients undergoing each operation in the 2014 and 2016 National Inpatient Sample. Data were aggregated at the hospital-level to attain hospital-specific median index hospital costs in 2019 US dollars and corresponding annual procedure volumes. Cost variation was assessed using caterpillar plots and risk-standardized observed/expected cost ratios. Correlation analysis, variance decomposition, and regression analysis explored costs' association with volume.

resultsIn 2016, 1,563 hospitals representing 86,170 LA and 2,276 hospitals representing 230,120 LC met the inclusion criteria. In 2014, the numbers were similar (1,602 and 2,259 hospitals). Compared with a mean of US $10,202, LA median costs ranged from US $2,850 to US $33,381. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy median costs ranged from US $4,406 to US $40,585 with a mean of US $12,567. Differences in cost strongly associated with procedure volume. Volume accounted for 9.9% (LA) and 12.4% (LC) of variation between hospitals, after controlling for the influence of other hospital (8.2% and 5.0%) and patient (6.3% and 3.7%) characteristics and in-hospital complications (0.8% and 0.4%). Counterfactual modeling suggests that were all hospitals to have performed at or below their expected median cost, one would see a national cost savings of greater than US $301.9 million per year (95% confidence interval, US $280.6-325.5 million).

conclusionMarked variability of median hospital costs for common operations exists. Differences remained consistent across changing coding structures and database years and were strongly associated with volume. Taken together, the findings suggest room for improvement in emergency general surgery and a need to address large discrepancies in an often-overlooked aspect of value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological, level III.

Indexed as

AdultAppendectomyBenchmarkingCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsDatabases, FactualHospital CostsHospitalsHumansLength of StayPostoperative ComplicationsUnited StatesWorkload

Identifiers

PMID32039972
PMCPMC7802807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.