Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039934›Full record

Trial reportJournal of addiction medicine

Secondary Analysis of Pain Outcomes in a Large Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Buprenorphine/Naloxone Versus Methadone for Opioid Use Disorder.

Matisyahu Shulman, Sean X Luo, Aimee N C Campbell, Jennifer Scodes, Martina Pavlicova, Andi Broffman, Andrew J Saxon, Edward V Nunes

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matisyahu ShulmanNew York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, (MS, SL, ANCC, JS, AB, EVN); Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, (MS, SL, ANCC, JS, EVN); Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, (MP); Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine; Center of Excellence in Substance Abuse Treatment and Education VA Puget Sound Health Care System, WA (AJS).
Sean X Luo
Aimee N C Campbell
Jennifer Scodes
Martina Pavlicova
Andi Broffman
Andrew J Saxon
Edward V Nunes
Association for Jewish Studies · USElectric Vehicle Challenge · US

Funding

Project-003UG1DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Aimee N Campbell, Jennifer McNeely · 2015 to 2026
$130.3M
CU PARTNERS: NY/LONG ISLAND REGIONAL NODEU10DA013035 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI NUNES, EDWARD V., ROTROSEN, JOHN P · 2001 to 2015
$47.6M
Translational Clinical Research Fellowship on Substance Use DisordersT32DA007294 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Frances Rudnick Levin, Diana M Martinez · 1993 to 2026
$9.3M
Drug Abuse Treatment Development and Research MentoringK24DA022412 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NUNES, EDWARD V. · 2007 to 2016
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA022412NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007294NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA013035NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOpioid use disorder (OUD) is associated with chronic pain. We investigated the association between medication treatments for OUD and pain in a post-hoc secondary analysis of a randomized trial of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone.

methods1241 individuals with OUD participated in an open label, pragmatic randomized trial of methadone versus buprenorphine/naloxone in nine treatment programs licensed to dispense agonist medication for OUD between 2006 to 2009. In this post-hoc analysis, pain was dichotomized (present or not present) using responses from the Short Form-36. Logistic regression models were fit to test the effect of (1) having baseline pain on week 24 retention, (2) treatment assignment on improvement in pain among those reporting pain at baseline, and (3) pain improvement at week 4 on week 24 retention among those reporting pain at baseline.

resultsAlmost half (48.2%) of the sample reported pain at baseline. Participants with baseline pain did not significantly differ in week 24 retention compared to those without baseline pain. Among those reporting pain at baseline, there was no significant difference between treatment arms in improvement of pain at week 4, but improvement in pain at week 4 was associated with significantly greater odds of being retained at week 24 (OR [95% CI] = 1.76 [1.10, 2.82], P = 0.020). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this large multisite randomized trial of medication treatments for OUD, nearly half of the participants reported pain at baseline, and improvement in pain early in treatment was associated with increased likelihood of retention in treatment.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationHumansMethadoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentPainAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationMethadoneNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID32039934
PMCPMC7415472
OpenAlexW3006382653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.