Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039859›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuromuscular diseases2020

RESTORE: A Prospective Multinational Registry of Patients with Genetically Confirmed Spinal Muscular Atrophy - Rationale and Study Design.

Richard S Finkel, John W Day, Darryl C De Vivo, Janbernd Kirschner, Eugenio Mercuri, Francesco Muntoni, Perry B Shieh, Eduardo Tizzano, Isabelle Desguerre, Susana Quijano-Roy and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical perspectives: Treating spinal muscular atrophy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Richard S FinkelDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neurology, Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, FL, United States.
John W DayDepartment of Neurology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, United States.
Darryl C De VivoDepartments of Neurology and Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, United States.
Janbernd KirschnerClinic for Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disease, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Eugenio MercuriDepartment of Paediatric Neurology and Nemo Clinical Centre, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Francesco MuntoniDepartment of Developmental Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Perry B ShiehDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Eduardo TizzanoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Genetics, Hospital Valle Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Isabelle DesguerreHôpital Necker Enfants Malades, APHP, Paris.
Susana Quijano-RoyGarches Neuromuscular Reference Center (GNMH), APHP Raymond Poincare University Hospital (UVSQ), Garches, France.
Kayoko SaitoInstitute of Medical Genetics, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Marcus DroegeAveXis, Inc., Bannockburn, IL, United States.
Omar DabbousAveXis, Inc., Bannockburn, IL, United States.
Farid KhanAveXis, Inc., Bannockburn, IL, United States.
Lydie RenaultAveXis, Switzerland GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland.
Frederick A AndersonCenter for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, United States.
Laurent ServaisOxford Neuromuscular Center, Oxford University, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDramatic improvements in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treatment have changed the prognosis for patients with this disease, leading to important new questions. Gathering representative, real-world data about the long-term efficacy and safety of emerging SMA interventions is essential to document their impact on patients and caregivers.

objectivesThis registry will assess outcomes in patients with genetically confirmed SMA and provide information on the effectiveness and long-term safety of approved and emerging treatments. DESIGN AND

methodsRESTORE is a prospective, multicenter, multinational observational registry. Patients will be managed according to usual clinical practice. Both newly recruitedSMAtreatment centers and sites involved in existing SMA registries, including iSMAC, Treat-NMD, French SMA Assistance Publique- Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Cure-SMA, SMArtCARE, will be eligible to participate; de novo; sites already participating in another registry may be included via consortium agreements. Data from patients enrolled in partnering registries will be shared with the RESTORE Registry and data for newly diagnosed patients will be added upon enrollment. Patients will be enrolled over a 5-year period and followed for 15 years or until death. Assessments will include SMA history and treatment, pulmonary, nutritional, and motor milestones, healthcare resource utilization, work productivity, activity impairment, adverse events, quality of life, caregiver burden, and survival.Status:Recruitment started in September 2018. As of January 3, 2020, 64 patients were enrolled at 25 participating sites.

conclusionsThe RESTORE Registry has begun recruiting recently diagnosed patients with genetically confirmed SMA, enabling assessment of both short- and long-term patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Muscular Atrophy, SpinalRegistriesResearch DesignHumansProspective StudiesRare Diseaseslong-term follow-upmultinationaloutcomesprospectiverare diseaseregistrySpinal muscular atrophy

Identifiers

PMID32039859
PMCPMC7739962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.