Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039819›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

Perspective of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer on Electronic Access to Scan Results: Mixed-Methods Study.

Christina Baun, Marianne Vogsen, Marie Konge Nielsen, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Malene Grubbe Hildebrandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient online access to general practice medical records: A qualitative study on patients' needs and expectations.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina BaunDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5199-9200
Marianne VogsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6124-4063
Marie Konge NielsenResearch Unit on User Perspectives, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3683-8361
Poul Flemming Høilund-CarlsenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7420-2367
Malene Grubbe HildebrandtDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2720-9018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient-accessible electronic health records give patients quick and easy access to their health care data, enabling them to view their test results online prior to a clinic visit. Hospital reports can be difficult for patients to understand, however, and can lead to unnecessary anxiety.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate the attitudes and experiences of Danish patients with metastatic breast cancer in using electronic health records to view their own scan results.

methodsWe conducted a prospective mixed-methods study in a sequential design at our institution during 2018. Participants were women with metastatic breast cancer who were having scans every 3 months (combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography or computed tomography alone) to monitor treatment effects. Participants first received an online questionnaire about their knowledge and use of online access to scan results. We then conducted semistructured interviews with 4 women who used the online access to view their scan results.

resultsA total of 46 patients received the questionnaire (median age 66, SD 11.8, range 34-84 years). Of these women, 38 (83%) completed the survey (median age 69, SD 10.7, range 42-84 years). Most patients (34/38) were aware of the opportunity to access their reports online, but only 40% (15/38) used this access to read their scan results. Barriers to online access were (1) anxiety over reading the scan results in the absence of clinician support, and (2) a preference to receive all disease information at their next hospital appointment. The patients who read their scan result found that facilitators were greater transparency and empowerment, and barriers were the consequences of reading bad news, the feeling of dilemma about the access, and the medical terminology.

conclusionsPatients with metastatic breast cancer generally had a positive attitude toward electronic access to their scan results, and those who used this opportunity played a greater participatory role in their disease and its management. Others described the potential distress this opportunity caused. The study findings suggest that immediate online access to scan results should be available to patients, but it needs a support function alongside that ensures optimal patient care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProspective StudiesSurveys and Questionnairesbreast cancerbreast neoplasmselectronic health recordspatient accessible electronic health recordpatient access to recordspatient perspectivescan result

Identifiers

PMID32039819
PMCPMC7055828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.