Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039739›Full record

ArticleTrials2020

Emotion regulation training in the treatment of obesity in young adolescents: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Taaike Debeuf, Sandra Verbeken, Elisa Boelens, Brenda Volkaert, Eva Van Malderen, Nathalie Michels, Caroline Braet

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Adolescents Who Are Overweight or Obese Exhibit Weaker Spatial and Verbal Working Memory Compared with Healthy-Weight Peers.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taaike DebeufDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Taaike.Debeuf@Ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4754-7348
Sandra VerbekenDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Elisa BoelensDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Brenda VolkaertDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Eva Van MalderenDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nathalie MichelsDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Caroline BraetDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEUniversity College Ghent · BE

Funding

Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds BOF.24J.2016.0007.02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence rates of childhood obesity are increasing. The current multidisciplinary treatments for (childhood) obesity are effective but only moderately and in the short term. A possible explanation for the onset and maintenance of childhood obesity is that it reflects a maladaptive mechanism for regulating high levels of stress and emotions. Therefore, the current RCT study aims to test the effectiveness of adding an emotion regulation training to care as usual (multidisciplinary obesity treatment) in young inpatients (10-14) involved in an obesity treatment program compared to care as usual alone. The research model for this RCT study states that when high levels of stress are regulated in a maladaptive way, this can contribute to the development of obesity.

methodsThe current study will recruit 140 youngsters (10-14 years) who are involved in an inpatient multidisciplinary obesity treatment (MOT) program. After giving consent to participate in the study, youngsters will be randomly assigned, during consecutive waves, to one of two conditions: care as usual (receiving MOT) or intervention (receiving MOT in addition to emotion regulation training). The training itself consists of 12 weekly sessions, followed by a booster session after 3 and 5 months. The participants will be tested pretraining, post-training, and at 6 months' follow-up. We hypothesize that, compared to the control condition, youngsters in the intervention condition will (1) use more adaptive emotion regulation strategies and (2) report less emotional eating, both primary outcome measures. Moreover, on the level of secondary outcome measures, we hypothesize that youngsters in the intervention condition, compared with the control condition, will (3) report better sleep quality, (4) undergo improved weight loss and weight loss maintenance, and (5) experience better long-term (6-months) psychological well-being. DISCUSSION: This study will add to both the scientific and clinical literature on the role of emotion regulation in the development and maintenance of different psychopathologies, as emotion regulation is a transdiagnostic factor.

trial registrationThe RCT study protocol is registered at ISRCTN Registry, with study ID "ISRCTN 83822934." Registered on 13 December 2017.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationAdolescentChildExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMalePediatric ObesityPrevalencePsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSleepStress, PhysiologicalStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeEmotion regulation trainingObesityStressYoungsters

Identifiers

PMID32039739
PMCPMC7011608
OpenAlexW3008566433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.