Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039702›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

High-density genotyping reveals signatures of selection related to acclimation and economically important traits in 15 local sheep breeds from Russia.

Andrey A Yurchenko, Tatiana E Deniskova, Nikolay S Yudin, Arsen V Dotsev, Timur N Khamiruev, Marina I Selionova, Sergey V Egorov, Henry Reyer, Klaus Wimmers, Gottfried Brem and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polymorphism ofAnimal biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Selection Signatures in the Genome of Dzhalgin Merino Sheep Breed.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrey A YurchenkoThe Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Tatiana E DeniskovaL.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, 142132, Russia.
Nikolay S YudinThe Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Arsen V DotsevL.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, 142132, Russia.
Timur N KhamiruevResearch Institute of Veterinary Medicine of Eastern Siberia, The Branch of the Siberian Federal Scientific Center for Agrobiotechnologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Chita, Russia.
Marina I SelionovaAll-Russian Research Institute of Sheep and Goat Breeding - branch of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution North Caucasian Agrarian Center, Stavropol, 355017, Russia.
Sergey V EgorovSiberian Research Institute of Animal Husbandry, Krasnoobsk, Russia.
Henry ReyerInstitute of Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany.
Klaus WimmersInstitute of Genome Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Dummerstorf, Germany.
Gottfried BremL.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, 142132, Russia.
Natalia A ZinovievaL.K. Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, Podolsk, 142132, Russia. n_zinovieva@mail.ru.
Denis M LarkinThe Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, The Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ICG SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia. dmlarkin@gmail.com.
Federal Scientific Center for Animal Husbandry named after Academician L.K. Ernst · RUResearch Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN) · DEInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RUNovosibirsk State University · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RUSiberian Research Institute of Animal Husbandry · RUUniversity of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestication and centuries of selective breeding have changed genomes of sheep breeds to respond to environmental challenges and human needs. The genomes of local breeds, therefore, are valuable sources of genomic variants to be used to understand mechanisms of response to adaptation and artificial selection. As a step toward this we performed a high-density genotyping and comprehensive scans for signatures of selection in the genomes from 15 local sheep breeds reared across Russia.

resultsResults demonstrated that the genomes of Russian sheep breeds contain multiple regions under putative selection. More than 50% of these regions matched with intervals identified in previous scans for selective sweeps in sheep genomes. These regions contain well-known candidate genes related to morphology, adaptation, and domestication (e.g., KITLG, KIT, MITF, and MC1R), wool quality and quantity (e.g., DSG@, DSC@, and KRT@), growth and feed intake (e.g., HOXA@, HOXC@, LCORL, NCAPG, LAP3, and CCSER1), reproduction (e.g., CMTM6, HTRA1, GNAQ, UBQLN1, and IFT88), and milk-related traits (e.g., ABCG2, SPP1, ACSS1, and ACSS2). In addition, multiple genes that are putatively related to environmental adaptations were top-ranked in selected intervals (e.g., EGFR, HSPH1, NMUR1, EDNRB, PRL, TSHR, and ADAMTS5). Moreover, we observed that multiple key genes involved in human hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathies, and genetic disorders accompanied with an inability to feel pain and environmental temperatures, were top-ranked in multiple or individual sheep breeds from Russia pointing to a possible mechanism of adaptation to harsh climatic conditions.

conclusionsOur work represents the first comprehensive scan for signatures of selection in genomes of local sheep breeds from the Russian Federation of both European and Asian origins. We confirmed that the genomes of Russian sheep contain previously identified signatures of selection, demonstrating the robustness of our integrative approach. Multiple novel signatures of selection were found near genes which could be related to adaptation to the harsh environments of Russia. Our study forms a basis for future work on using Russian sheep genomes to spot specific genetic variants or haplotypes to be used in efforts on developing next-generation highly productive breeds, better suited to diverse Eurasian environments.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesAcclimatizationAnimalsBreedingFemaleLactationMilkPigmentationPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyReproductionRussiaSheepAdaptationGenotypingLocal sheep breedsRussian FederationSelection

Identifiers

PMID32039702
PMCPMC7227232
OpenAlexW2944010535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.