Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039698›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

The differences in brain stem transcriptional profiling in hypertensive ISIAH and normotensive WAG rats.

Larisa A Fedoseeva, Leonid O Klimov, Nikita I Ershov, Vadim M Efimov, Arcady L Markel, Yuriy L Orlov, Olga E Redina

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Larisa A FedoseevaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyeva, 10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090.
Leonid O KlimovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyeva, 10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090.
Nikita I ErshovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyeva, 10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090.
Vadim M EfimovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyeva, 10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090.
Arcady L MarkelInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyeva, 10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090.
Yuriy L OrlovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyeva, 10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090.
Olga E RedinaInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentyeva, 10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630090. oredina@ngs.ru.
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUNovosibirsk State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of essential hypertension is associated with a wide range of mechanisms. The brain stem neurons are essential for the homeostatic regulation of arterial pressure as they control baroreflex and sympathetic nerve activity. The ISIAH (Inherited Stress Induced Arterial Hypertension) rats reproduce the human stress-sensitive hypertensive disease with predominant activation of the neuroendocrine hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and sympathetic adrenal axes. RNA-Seq analysis of the brain stems from the hypertensive ISIAH and normotensive control WAG (Wistar Albino Glaxo) rats was performed to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and the main central mechanisms (biological processes and metabolic pathways) contributing to the hypertensive state in the ISIAH rats.

resultsThe study revealed 224 DEGs. Their annotation in databases showed that 22 of them were associated with hypertension and blood pressure (BP) regulation, and 61 DEGs were associated with central nervous system diseases. In accordance with the functional annotation of DEGs, the key role of hormonal metabolic processes and, in particular, the enhanced biosynthesis of aldosterone in the brain stem of ISIAH rats was proposed. Multiple DEGs associated with several Gene Ontology (GO) terms essentially related to modulation of BP were identified. Abundant groups of DEGs were related to GO terms associated with responses to different stimuli including response to organic (hormonal) substance, to external stimulus, and to stress. Several DEGs making the most contribution to the inter-strain differences were detected including the Ephx2, which was earlier defined as a major candidate gene in the studies of transcriptional profiles in different tissues/organs (hypothalamus, adrenal gland and kidney) of ISIAH rats.

conclusionsThe results of the study showed that inter-strain differences in ISIAH and WAG brain stem functioning might be a result of the imbalance in processes leading to the pathology development and those, exerting the compensatory effects. The data obtained in this study are useful for a better understanding of the genetic mechanisms underlying the complexity of the brain stem processes in ISIAH rats, which are a model of stress-sensitive form of hypertension.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAnimalsBlood PressureBrain StemHypertensionMolecular Sequence AnnotationRatsSpecies SpecificityStress, PhysiologicalTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsBrain stemISIAH rat strainRNA-SeqStress-sensitive hypertensionTranscriptional profiling

Identifiers

PMID32039698
PMCPMC7226933
OpenAlexW2944371056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.