Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039505›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

Association of fecal sample collection technique and treatment history with Tritrichomonas foetus polymerase chain reaction test results in 1717 cats.

Barry A Hedgespeth, Stephen H Stauffer, James B Robertson, Jody L Gookin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barry A HedgespethDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Stephen H StaufferDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
James B RobertsonCollege of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Jody L GookinDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-0874
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

Comparative Medicine and Translational Research Training ProgramT32OD011130 · OD · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Lauren Virginia Schnabel · 2012 to 2026
$7.8M
NIH HHS T32 OD011130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFecal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for Tritrichomonas foetus is considered the most sensitive means for diagnosis of infection but results could be influenced by fecal collection technique and prior use of antimicrobial drugs.

objectivesTo establish any association between fecal collection technique or treatment history and results of fecal PCR testing for T. foetus. ANIMALS: Fecal samples from 1717 cats submitted by veterinarians between January 2012 and December 2017.

methodsThis study used a retrospective analysis. T. foetus PCR test results from 1808 fecal samples submitted for diagnostic testing were examined for their association with method of fecal collection and prior antimicrobial treatments. Data were collected from sample submission form.

resultsPositive T. foetus PCR test results were obtained for 274 (16%) cats. Fecal samples collected via fecal loop had increased probability of positive PCR test results (odds ratio [OR] 2.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.17, P = .002) compared to samples collected by colonic flush. There was no association between PCR test results and treatment history, treatment type, or prior treatment with ronidazole. After an initial positive PCR test, 4/19 (21%; 95% CI 2.7%-39.4%) cats treated with ronidazole had a second positive test result. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Results of this study support that fecal samples collected by loop might be better for PCR diagnosis of T. foetus infection. Lack of association of ronidazole with PCR test results and a 21% all-potential-causes failure rate of ronidazole in cats with preconfirmed infection are important limitations to use of this drug.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsCat DiseasesCatsFecesFemaleMalePolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan Infections, AnimalRetrospective StudiesRonidazoleSpecimen HandlingTritrichomonas foetusUnited StatesAntiprotozoal AgentsRonidazolediarrhearetrospectiverisk factorsronidazole

Identifiers

PMID32039505
PMCPMC7096610
OpenAlexW3005292174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.