ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2020
Efficient
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional editing of the OTC locus by targeted integration with phenotype correction and restoration of endogenous expression patterns.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Gene therapy for liver diseases: methods, challenges and opportunities.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Review
- Engineering adeno-associated viral vectors for CRISPR/Cas based in vivo therapeutic genome editing.Biomaterials · 2025Review
- The evolving landscape of NF gene therapy: Hurdles and opportunities.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- CRISPR/Cas System: A Powerful Strategy to Improve Monogenic Human Diseases as Therapeutic Delivery; Current Applications and Challenges.Current gene therapy · 2025Review
- A bioinformatic analysis of gene editing off-target loci altered by common polymorphisms, using 'PopOff'.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Article
- Exploration of the potential of genomic editing in the treatment of congenital adrenal hyperplasia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Long read sequencing reveals transgene concatemerization and vector sequences integration following AAV-driven electroporation of CRISPR RNP complexes in mouse zygotes.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
- AAV-delivered hepato-adrenal cooperativity in steroidogenesis: Implications for gene therapy for congenital adrenal hyperplasia.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Donor template delivery by recombinant adeno-associated virus for the production of knock-in mice.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Gene therapy for urea cycle defects: An update from historical perspectives to future prospects.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2024Review
- Diagnostic and Management Issues in Patients with Late-Onset Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Genetic Therapy Approaches for Ornithine Transcarbamylase Deficiency.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Multi-faceted CRISPR/Cas technological innovation aspects in the framework of 3P medicine.The EPMA journal · 2023Review
- Low-dose AAV-CRISPR-mediated liver-specific knock-in restored hemostasis in neonatal hemophilia B mice with subtle antibody response.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Predicting the disease severity in male individuals with ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Article
- Modelling urea cycle disorders using iPSCs.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2022Review
- Liver-humanized mice: A translational strategy to study metabolic disorders.Journal of cellular physiology · 2022Review
- Novel vectors and approaches for gene therapy in liver diseases.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsGenome editing technology has immense therapeutic potential and is likely to rapidly supplant contemporary gene addition approaches. Key advantages include the capacity to directly repair mutant loci with resultant recovery of physiological gene expression and maintenance of durable therapeutic effects in replicating cells. In this study, we aimed to repair a disease-causing point mutation in the ornithine transcarbamylase (
methodsEditing reagents for precise CRISPR/SaCas9-mediated cleavage and homology-directed repair (HDR) of the human
resultsFollowing AAV-mediated delivery of editing reagents to patient-derived primary human hepatocytes
conclusionsWe report efficient single-nucleotide correction of a disease-causing mutation in the LAY SUMMARY: The ability to efficiently and safely correct disease-causing mutations remains the holy grail of gene therapy. Herein, we demonstrate, for the first time, efficient
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.