ArticleConditioning medicine2019
Epigenetic Regulation by Dietary Restriction: Part II.
Article in Conditioning medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calorie restriction modulates the transcription of genes related to stress response and longevity in human muscle: The CALERIE study.Aging cell · 2023Trial
- The nutrigenomic-epigenetic axis in cancer: from dietary bioactives to precision oncology.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Review
- Anhydrobiosis as a Model of Aging and Longevity: The Role of Autophagy and Metabolism in Yeast Cells.Microbial ecology · 2026Review
- Timing of dietary effects on the epigenome and their potential protective effects against toxins.Epigenetics · 2025Review
- Pharmacological Approaches to Decelerate Aging: A Promising Path.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Review
- Ageing and Obesity Shared Patterns: From Molecular Pathogenesis to Epigenetics.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Review
- Mitochondrial DNA and Neurodegeneration: Any Role for Dietary Antioxidants?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In the first part of our review, we extensively discuss the different variants of dietary restriction (DR) regimens, as well as its corresponding mechanism(s) and subsequent effects. We also provide a detailed analysis of the different epigenetic mechanisms based on current knowledge. We postulate that DR may represent an environmental intervention that can modulate the epigenomic profile of an individual. It is highly plausible that epigenetic regulation by DR may help explain the asymmetric manifestation of DR effects in different individuals. Additionally, epigenetic modifications via DR may lead to epigenetic programming, providing protection against age-associated diseases, which in turn could lead to reduced morbidity and increased lifespan. In the second part of the review, we summarize recent findings that highlight the epigenomic axis of DR, which provides a better understanding of the mechanisms by which its numerous health benefits are achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32039346PMC7007178W3010583352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.