Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039266›Full record

ReviewStem cell investigation2019

Safety and efficacy of stem cell therapy for treatment of neural damage in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Mohammadmahdi Jafarzadeh Bejargafshe, Mohammad Hedayati, Sahar Zahabiasli, Eisa Tahmasbpour, Saeed Rahmanzadeh, Amir Nejad-Moghaddam

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Amnion-Derived Multipotent Progenitor Cells Suppress Experimental Optic Neuritis and Myelitis.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  11. HGF and MET: From Brain Development to Neurological Disorders.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammadmahdi Jafarzadeh BejargafsheYoung Researchers and Elite Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad HedayatiDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Rasht Branch, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Sahar ZahabiasliDepartment of Plantprotection, Rasht Branch, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
Eisa TahmasbpourLaboratory of Regenerative Medicine & Biomedical Innovations, Genetics & Metabolism Research Group, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed RahmanzadehEnzyme Technology Lab, Genetics & Metabolism Research Group, Pasteur Institute of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Nejad-MoghaddamMarine Medicine Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Pasteur Institute of Iran · IRUniversity of Guilan · IRBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a multifocal inflammatory disease that involves the central nervous system and associated with limbs paralysis and serious problems in sensation, limbs, visual and sphincter. This disease is a result of autoimmune mechanism in which autoantibodies target the self-myelin antigens and cause demyelination. Because of the myelin dysfunction, MS is clinically identified with neurological disabilities. Furthermore, it can be entered into the progressive phase because of irreversible neurodegeneration and axons damage. Unfortunately, there is no effective therapeutic method for this disease and current medications have been focused on amelioration of symptoms and chronic inflammation. Although current immunotherapies ameliorate the reactivity of autoimmune anti-myelin and MS relapse rate, there is no approved method for improvement of the disease progression and repairing of the damaged myelin. Therefore, finding an appropriate clinical treatment for improvement of neurological damages in MS patients is essential. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells with high proliferative and self-renewal capacities, as well as immunomodulatory and neuroregenerative effects. Bone marrow and adipose tissues derived MSCs have been considered for the treatment of different diseases because not only they can be easily isolated from these tissues, but also a patient can be served as a donor for himself without the risk of rejection. More importantly, autologous MSCs carry a safer pattern without the risk of malignant transformation. Here, we will discuss the effectiveness of MSCs therapy for MS patients by reviewing of clinical trials.

Indexed as

cell-based therapyinflammationmesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)Multiple sclerosis (MS)

Identifiers

PMID32039266
PMCPMC6987330
OpenAlexW2997339631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.