Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32039249›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Rapid

Yuya Nagasawa, Yoshio Kiku, Kazue Sugawara, Naohiro Yabusaki, Kazuyoshi Oono, Kento Fujii, Takahide Suzuki, Koji Maehana, Tomohito Hayashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in methods for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  2. Occurrence and diagnostic of intermittent shedding ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuya NagasawaDairy Hygiene Unit, Division of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hokkaido Research Station, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Sapporo, Japan.
Yoshio KikuDairy Hygiene Unit, Division of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hokkaido Research Station, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Sapporo, Japan.
Kazue SugawaraDairy Hygiene Unit, Division of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hokkaido Research Station, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Sapporo, Japan.
Naohiro YabusakiNOSAI Minami, Ebetsu, Japan.
Kazuyoshi OonoNOSAI Minami, Ebetsu, Japan.
Kento FujiiNOSAI Minami, Ebetsu, Japan.
Takahide SuzukiNOSAI Minami, Ebetsu, Japan.
Koji MaehanaHealthcare R&D Center, Asahi Kasei Corporation, Fuji, Japan.
Tomohito HayashiDairy Hygiene Unit, Division of Pathology and Pathophysiology, Hokkaido Research Station, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Sapporo, Japan.
National Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPNational Institute of Animal Health · JPAsahi Kasei (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid diagnostic technologies for bovine mastitis caused by

Indexed as

bovine mastitisimmunochromatographic stripmilkrapid diagnosis technologyStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID32039249
PMCPMC6988510
OpenAlexW3003016217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.