ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry
The Effectiveness of Micro-osteoperforations during Canine Retraction: A Three-dimensional Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of Micro-Osteoperforations on Orthodontic Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Progress in orthodontics · 2020Pooled it
- Comparison of the effectiveness of piezocision-aided canine retraction augmented with micro-osteoperforation: a randomized controlled trial.The Angle orthodontist · 2024Trial
- Effects of Micro-Osteoperforation Depths on Canine Retraction Rate and Root Resorption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of dentistry · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the effects for root resorption in orthodontic tooth movement with micro-osteoperforations in mice.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Effect of 3D-printing assisted micro-osteoperforations on the rate of canine retraction: a clinical investigation.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluating Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa B Ligand (RANKL) and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression during canine retraction: A comparison between periodontal distraction versus conventional retraction.Journal of orthodontic science · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Methods of measuring distal canine movement and rotation- A review.Journal of orthodontic science · 2023Review
- Effect of Mini-implant assisted Micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement-A randomized clinical trial.Journal of orthodontic science · 2023Article
- Effect of Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on new bone formation in surgical expansion with mini-screw assisted rapid palatal expander: A dog model study.Journal of orthodontic science · 2023Article
- The effect of micro-osteoperforation on root resorption, pulp vitality, and biological changes of teeth subjected to orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review study.Dental research journal · 2023Article
- Adverse Effects of Surgically Accelerated Orthodontic Techniques: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Biological Anchorage and Canine Orthodontic Movement Rate with a New Technique for Micro-Osteoperforations.Case reports in dentistry · 2022Article
- Article
- Micro-osteoperforations and Its Effect on the Rate of Tooth Movement: A Systematic Review.European journal of dentistry · 2021Article
- Erratum: The effectiveness of micro-osteoperforations during canine retraction: A three-dimensional randomized clinical trial.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry · 2020Article
- Space Closure with Different Appointment Intervals: A Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimA major challenge in orthodontics is decreasing treatment time without compromising treatment outcome. The purpose of this split-mouth trial was to evaluate micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. MATERIALS AND
methodsEight patients of both genders were selected, age ranging between 15 and 40 years, with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. The participants in this trial with MOPs were randomly allocated to either the right or the left side, distal to the maxillary canine. First maxillary premolars were extracted as part of the treatment plan on both sides and then canine retraction was applied. Miniscrews were used to support anchorage. MOP side received (three small perforations) placed on the buccal bone, distal to the maxillary canine, on randomly selected side using an automated mini-implant driver and the other side was the control side. Blinding was used at the data collection and analysis stages. The primary outcome was the rate of canine retraction measured with a three-dimensional (3D) digital model from the baseline to the first 2 weeks superimposed at the rugae area from the baseline to the first, second, and third months. The following secondary outcomes were examined: anchorage loss, canine tipping, canine rotation, root resorption, plaque index, and gingival index. Pain level, pain interference with the patients' daily life, patients' satisfaction with the procedure and degree of ease, willingness to repeat the procedure, and recommendation to others were also evaluated.
resultsNo statistically significant difference was observed in the rates of tooth movement between the MOP and the control sides at all-time points (first month:
conclusionAccording to our clinical trial, MOPs cannot help in speeding up a canine retraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.