A multi-omics approach to understanding the field effect in bladder cancer.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Comparison of microRNA-21 expression in bladder cancer tumor with normal-appearing adjacent tissue and healthy controls.International urology and nephrology · 2025
   Article
2. A comparative analysis of robotic prostatectomy techniques post TURP/HOLEP: retzius-sparing vs. non-retzius approaches: evaluation of perioperative, functional, and oncological outcomes.International urology and nephrology · 2025
   Article
3. Contribution of Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles to Malignant Transformation of Normal Cells.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Whole-Organ Genomic Characterization of Mucosal Field Effects Initiating Bladder Carcinogenesis.2019

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.