ArticleFood safety (Tokyo, Japan)2018
Evaluation of Necessity of 1-year Toxicity Study in Dogs - development of the New Tiered Approach for Toxicity Studies of Pesticide Considering Species Difference in "toxicity profile" and "toxicity dose-response".
Article in Food safety (Tokyo, Japan), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Scientific Opinion on waiving of the dog studies in the regulatory process of agrochemicals approval.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Self-Assembled Hydrogels: A Novel Drug Delivery System for Osteoarthritis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Subject fields in Food Safety during 10 years.Food safety (Tokyo, Japan) · 2021Article
- Review on the One-year Repeated Dose Oral Toxicity Study in Dogs for the Toxicological Evaluation of Pesticides (Agricultural Chemicals) (Decision of the Expert Committee on Pesticide, FSCJ, 21 December 2017).Food safety (Tokyo, Japan) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, a long-term (1-year) dog toxicity study has not been a mandatory toxicity study for application of agricultural chemical in the United States (US) and the European Union (EU). This study was conducted to propose a guide for making science-based judgement on the necessity of long-term dog toxicity study, which is one of required toxicity studies at toxicological evaluation in Japanese pesticide regulation system. In order to carry out the proposal we analyzed the results of toxicity studies including subacute (3-month) toxicity study in dogs or toxicity studies in other species in the pesticide evaluation reports published by the Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ), the responsible regulatory body for toxicological evaluation of pesticides in food. In the analysis of evaluation reports of 286 pesticides ADI (acceptable daily intake) of 93 pesticides (32.5%) were established based on dog studies. The ADIs of 74 pesticides among them, however were not considered to have a big influence if the long-term dog toxicity study was omitted. With regard to the other four agents the possibility that the long-term dog study becomes unnecessary was considered by adding detailed examination. With respect to the remaining 15 agents, we could not judge that long-term dog study were unnecessary. The analysis indicated that the dog long term test could be omitted in most cases. On the other hand, it should be considered carefully necessity of the long-term dog study when the toxicological profiles observed in dogs and rats were different, when the toxicity susceptibility in dogs was considered high, when no no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) is specified in subacute toxicity study in dogs or when bioaccumulation in dogs is concerned. We also noted that the studies already conducted for pesticide registered previously should be used for their hazard evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.