ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019
Comparative Analysis of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Orally administratedFrontiers in immunology · 2023Trial
- Safety assessment scheme for menstrual cups and application for the evaluation of a menstrual cup comprised of medical grade silicone.EBioMedicine · 2022Trial
- Effects of liraglutide on gut bacterial community dynamics.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Predicting bacterial vaginosis incidence using artificial neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Prebiotic and Chemopreventive Potential of Digested Cooked Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis) in Human HT-29 Colon Cancer Cells.Journal of food science · 2026Article
- Understanding the probiotic potential of a healthy human vaginal flora, Lactobacillus gasseri K9: genomic and in vitro aspects.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Women's health is a team effort: probiogenomics supports the development of a multi-species vaginal probiotic.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association analysis reveals specialization to hosts and niches in multiple species of the Lactobacillaceae.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Exploring the molecular crosstalk between the sex steroids drospirenone and ethinylestradiol with vaginal lactobacilli.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Population‑Specific Diversity of Dominant VaginalInternational journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Vaginal Weissella confusa MV0113 suppresses pathogens and restores microbiota to alleviate bacterial vaginosis: integrated genomic and in vivo evidence.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Elevated rates and biased spectra of mutations in anaerobically cultured lactic acid bacteria.mBio · 2025Article
- Modulation of group BInfection and immunity · 2025Article
- Insights into host dependency from a chemically defined medium for the human vaginal bacterium Lactobacillus crispatus.Archives of microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparative genomic analysis of bacteriocin genes in Lactobacillus crispatus strains.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Body site-specific micro- and lactobiota in genitourinary infections during pregnancy.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- The activity of cell-free supernatant ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- IgA and the gut-vagina axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Vaginal prevention of Candida albicans: synergistic effect of lactobacilli and mannan oligosaccharides (MOS).Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.