Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32038514›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Degradation of Recalcitrant Polyurethane and Xenobiotic Additives by a Selected Landfill Microbial Community and Its Biodegradative Potential Revealed by Proximity Ligation-Based Metagenomic Analysis.

Itzel Gaytán, Ayixon Sánchez-Reyes, Manuel Burelo, Martín Vargas-Suárez, Ivan Liachko, Maximilian Press, Shawn Sullivan, M Javier Cruz-Gómez, Herminia Loza-Tavera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring theFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Microbial plastic degradation: enzymes, pathways, challenges, and perspectives.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The Biodegradation of Acrylic-Coated Woven Fabrics byMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Itzel GaytánDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ayixon Sánchez-ReyesDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Manuel BureloDepartamento de Química Analítica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Martín Vargas-SuárezDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ivan LiachkoPhase Genomics Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Maximilian PressPhase Genomics Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Shawn SullivanPhase Genomics Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
M Javier Cruz-GómezDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Herminia Loza-TaveraDepartamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

Deconvolution and Assembly of Metagenomes Using Chromatin Conformation CaptureR44AI122654 · NIAID · PHASE GENOMICS, INC. · PI LIACHKO, IVAN · 2018 to 2019
$1.5M
A proximity ligation method to track mobile element hostsR44AI150008 · NIAID · PHASE GENOMICS, INC. · PI LIACHKO, IVAN · 2020 to 2021
$1.5M
Deconvolution and Assembly of Metgenomes Using Chromatin Conformation CaptureR43AI122654 · NIAID · PHASE GENOMICS, INC. · PI LIACHKO, IVAN · 2016 to 2016
$216k
NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI122654NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI122654NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI150008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyurethanes (PU) are the sixth most produced plastics with around 18-million tons in 2016, but since they are not recyclable, they are burned or landfilled, generating damage to human health and ecosystems. To elucidate the mechanisms that landfill microbial communities perform to attack recalcitrant PU plastics, we studied the degradative activity of a mixed microbial culture, selected from a municipal landfill by its capability to grow in a water PU dispersion (WPUD) as the only carbon source, as a model for the BP8 landfill microbial community. The WPUD contains a polyether-polyurethane-acrylate (PE-PU-A) copolymer and xenobiotic additives (

Indexed as

biodegradationbiodegradative potentialcommunity structureHi-C proximity-ligationmetagenomicsmicrobial communitypolyether-polyurethane-acrylatexenobiotic additives

Identifiers

PMID32038514
PMCPMC6987047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.