Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32038311›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Brain Activations to Dyspnea in Patients With COPD.

Thomas Reijnders, Thierry Troosters, Wim Janssens, Rik Gosselink, Daniel Langer, Paul W Davenport, Andreas von Leupoldt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06974448 (Comparison of Frontal Hemodynamic Responses and Electrical Brain Activity During Dual Tasks in COPD Patients Versus Healthy Individuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06974448 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Frontal Hemodynamic Responses and Electrical Brain Activity During Dual Tasks in COPD Patients Versus Healthy Individuals

TypeobservationalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled32ConditionsCOPD - Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Healty Controls
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Therapy for insomnia with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial of components.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Consistency Evaluation of Two Loading Devices in Measuring the Perception of Dyspnea.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thomas ReijndersHealth Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thierry TroostersDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wim JanssensDepartment of Chronic Disease, Metabolism and Aging, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rik GosselinkDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Daniel LangerDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Paul W DavenportDepartment of Physiological Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Andreas von LeupoldtHealth Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared the perception and neural processing of respiratory sensations between 20 COPD patients and 20 healthy controls by means of respiratory-related evoked potentials (RREP) in the electroencephalogram (EEG). RREPs were induced by short inspiratory occlusions while 129-channel EEG was measured. COPD patients rated the occlusions as more intense and unpleasant (

Indexed as

brainchronic obstructive pulmonary diseasedyspneaelectro encephalogramrespiratory related evoked potential

Identifiers

PMID32038311
PMCPMC6992658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.