Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32038284›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2019

A Brief History of Pacemaking.

Dario DiFrancesco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review: HCN Channels in the Heart.Current cardiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. A detailed characterization of the hyperpolarization-activated "funny" current (IPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Cardiac effects and toxicity of chloroquine: a short update.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2020
    Review
  16. Cardiac and neuronal HCN channelopathies.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dario DiFrancescoDepartment of Biosciences, University of Milano, IBF-CNR University of Milano Unit, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac pacemaking is a most fundamental cardiac function, thoroughly investigated for decades with a multiscale approach at organ, tissue, cell and molecular levels, to clarify the basic mechanisms underlying generation and control of cardiac rhythm. Understanding the processes involved in pacemaker activity is of paramount importance for a basic physiological knowledge, but also as a way to reveal details of pathological dysfunctions useful in the perspective of a therapeutic approach. Among the mechanisms involved in pacemaking, the "funny" (I

Indexed as

cardiac ratefunny currentHCN channelopathiesHCN channelsIf currentivabradinepacemaker

Identifiers

PMID32038284
PMCPMC6987461
OpenAlexW3002195458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.