Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32038267›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2019

Physical Activity as a New Tool to Evaluate the Response to Omalizumab and Mepolizumab in Severe Asthmatic Patients: A Pilot Study.

Giovanna Elisiana Carpagnano, Francesco Sessa, Giulia Scioscia, Donato Lacedonia, Maria Pia Foschino, Maria Pia Venuti, Antonio Ivano Triggiani, Anna Valenzano, Onofrio Resta, Giuseppe Cibelli and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Patient-centred outcomes in severe asthma: fatigue, sleep, physical activity and work.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giovanna Elisiana CarpagnanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Francesco SessaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giulia SciosciaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Donato LacedoniaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Maria Pia FoschinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Maria Pia VenutiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Antonio Ivano TriggianiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Anna ValenzanoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Onofrio RestaDepartment of Neurosciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppe CibelliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Giovanni MessinaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
University of Foggia · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease, representing one of the most severe pathologies in developed countries. Based on a report of the World Health Organization (WHO), it affects about 300 million people worldwide. Few studies have analyzed the effects of daily life physical activity (PA) levels in patients with asthma: moreover, little research has been carried out on PA levels in patients suffering from severe asthma (SA). This study aimed to investigate the PA levels in two groups of patients suffering from SA; in particular, this study analyzed the changes that occur in patients treated with biologic therapy (BT group) and patients who underwent traditional treatment (TT group) over 6 months. Moreover, this study represents a pilot study because, to the best of our knowledge, it is the first investigation that analyzed if the kind of biologic drug (omalizumab or mepolizumab) can produce differences in the PA levels of SA patients. Fifty SA patients were enrolled and PA parameters were monitored for 6 months. Subjects were divided into two treatment groups: TT (20 patients) and BT (30 patients), the BT group was further subdivided according to the drugs used (15, omalizumab; 15, mepolizumab). During drug treatment, all subjects improved their PA levels: indeed, considering the intragroup variation, the PA levels were significantly higher comparing the T6 levels to baseline (T0, p < 0.01). Considering the intragroup variation, it is very interesting to note that biologic therapy improved PA levels compared to the effects of traditional therapy; while at T0 there were no significant differences in the steps per day (SPD) values between the two groups (T0, p = 0.85), the differences become statistically significant at T1, T3, and T6 (T1, p = 0.019; T3, p = 3.48x10

Indexed as

mepolizumabomalizumabphysical activityquality of lifesevere asthma

Identifiers

PMID32038267
PMCPMC6992710
OpenAlexW3002714379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.