ArticleLeukemia & lymphoma2020
Phase I study of AR-42 and decitabine in acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic reprogramming as the nexus of cancer stemness and therapy resistance: implications for biomarker discovery.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Fermented Wheat Germ Protein with Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor AR42 Demonstrates Enhanced Cytotoxicity against Lymphoma Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the orally bioavailable 4-phenylbutyrate-tethered trichostatin A analogue AR42 in models of spinal muscular atrophy.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Epigenetic regulation in hematopoiesis and its implications in the targeted therapy of hematologic malignancies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Noncoding rules of survival: epigenetic regulation of normal and malignant hematopoiesis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers.MedComm · 2022Review
- Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis from First-in-Human Data for HDAC Inhibitor, REC-2282 (AR-42), in Patients with Solid Tumors and Hematologic Malignancies: A Case Study for Evaluating Flat vs. Body Size Normalized Dosing.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2021Article
- A phase 1 trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor AR-42 in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2-associated tumors and advanced solid malignancies.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2021Article
- Targeting DNA Damage Repair Functions of Two Histone Deacetylases, HDAC8 and SIRT6, Sensitizes Acute Myeloid Leukemia to NAMPT Inhibition.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
- Recent developments in epigenetic cancer therapeutics: clinical advancement and emerging trends.Journal of biomedical science · 2021Review
- Clinical Applications of MicroRNAs in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Small Molecules Targeting HATs, HDACs, and BRDs in Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This phase I trial sought to determine a biologically safe and effective dose of AR-42, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, which would lead to a doubling of miR-29b prior to decitabine administration. Thirteen patients with previously untreated or relapsed/refractory AML were treated at 3 dose levels (DL): AR-42 20 mg qd on d1,3,5 in DL1, 40 mg qd on d1,3,5 in DL2 and 40 mg qd on d1,3,4,5 in DL3. Patients received decitabine 20 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.