Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32037592›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2020

A randomized controlled trial of a physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention optimization strategy: Rationale and design of the TARGET FFR study.

Damien Collison, John D McClure, Colin Berry, Keith G Oldroyd

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03259815 nacompletednot on this map

How Often Can Optimal Post Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Results be Achieved? - a Randomised Controlled Trial of FFR Targeted PCI (the Target FFR Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS National Waiting Times Centre BoardRan2018 to 2020Enrolled260ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, Coronary StenosisArmsP.I.O.S., Pre and post-PCI coronary physiology measurements
NCT05491668 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Physiological Assessment of Severe Coronary Stenosis for Informing Planned PCI (REFINE PCI)

TypeobservationalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2022 to 2027Enrolled107ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsNon-hyperemic pressure ratio assessment pre and post PCI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Damien CollisonWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3531-0872
John D McClureInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Colin BerryWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.
Keith G OldroydWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/15/30661British Heart Foundation FS/17/26/32744British Heart Foundation FS172632744British Heart Foundation PG-17-25-32884British Heart Foundation PG/17/25/32884British Heart Foundation RE/18/6134217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≥0.90 confers an improved cardiac prognosis. There are currently limited data available to determine how often it is possible to improve an angiographically acceptable but physiologically suboptimal result. A physiology-guided optimization strategy can achieve a clinically meaningful increase in the proportion of patients achieving a final post-PCI FFR ≥0.90 compared to standard care. Following angiographically successful PCI procedures, 260 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive either a physiology-guided incremental optimization strategy (intervention group) or blinded post-PCI coronary physiology measurements (control group). Patients undergoing successful, standard-of-care PCI for either stable angina or non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction who meet the study's inclusion and exclusion criteria will be eligible for randomization. The primary endpoint is defined as the proportion of patients with a final post-PCI FFR result ≥0.90. Secondary endpoints include change from baseline in Seattle Angina Questionnaire and EQ-5D-5L scores at 3 months and the rate of target vessel failure and its components (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, unplanned rehospitalization with target vessel revascularization) at 3 months and 1 year. 260 individual patients were successfully randomized between March 2018 and November 2019. Key baseline demographics of the study population are reported within. TARGET FFR is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial of an FFR-guided PCI optimization strategy. The study has completed recruitment and is now in clinical follow-up. It is anticipated that primary results will be presented in Autumn 2020. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03259815. [Correction added on Apr 3 2020, after first online publication: Clinical Trials identifier added.].

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeClinical Decision-MakingCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleNon-ST Elevated Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective Studiescoronary physiologyfractional flow reservenon-hyperemic pressure ratiosPCI optimizationpost-PCI FFR

Identifiers

PMID32037592
PMCPMC7244297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.