Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32037503›Full record

ArticleCardiology journal2022

Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance and serial fractional flow reserve assessment of the left anterior descending artery in patients undergoing right coronary artery chronic total occlusion revascularization.

Richard E Jones, Grigoris V Karamasis, Jason N Dungu, Shah R Mohdnazri, Firas Al-Janabi, Daniel J Hammersley, Sanjay K Prasad, Kare H Tang, Paul A Kelly, Swamy Gedela and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusions on absolute perfusion in remote myocardium.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard E JonesThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom. richard.jones@btuh.nhs.uk.
Grigoris V KaramasisThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Jason N DunguThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Shah R MohdnazriThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Firas Al-JanabiThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Daniel J HammersleyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Sanjay K PrasadNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
Kare H TangThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Paul A KellyThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Swamy GedelaThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
John R DaviesThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Thomas R KeebleThe Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom.
Essex Cardiothoracic Centre · GBBasildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment of remote arteries, in the context of a bystander chronic total occlusion (CTO), can lead to false positive results. Adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluates perfusion defects across the entire myocardium and may therefore be a reliable tool in the work-up of remote lesions in CTO patients. The IMPACT-CTO study investigated donor artery invasive physiology before, immediately post, and at 4 months following right coronary artery (RCA) CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this subanalysis was to assess the concordance between baseline perfusion CMR and serial FFR evaluation of left anterior descending artery (LAD) ischemia in patients from the IMPACT-CTO study.

methodsBaseline adenosine stress CMR examinations from 26 patients were analyzed for qualitative evidence of LAD ischemia. The results were correlated with the serial LAD FFR measurements.

resultsThe present findings demonstrated that before RCA CTO PCI, there was 62% agreement between perfusion CMR and FFR (ischemic threshold £ 0.8) in the assessment of LAD ischemia (k = 0.29; fair concordance). At 4 months after revascularization, there was 77% agreement (k = 0.52; moderate concordance) between the index CMR assessment of LAD ischemia and the follow-up LAD FFR. Concordance was improved at a LAD FFR ischemic threshold of £ 0.75.

conclusionsIn this hypothesis generating study, baseline CMR assessment of LAD ischemia correlated better with the 4 months LAD FFR data (threshold £ 0.8) as compared to the FFR measurements taken prior to RCA CTO revascularization.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAdenosineCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsHumansMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPerfusionAdenosinechronic total occlusionpercutaneous coronary interventionstress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID32037503
PMCPMC8890403
OpenAlexW3005667179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.