Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32037497›Full record

ReviewMedical microbiology and immunology2020

Exploring the potential of polyethylene terephthalate in the design of antibacterial surfaces.

Tugçe Çaykara, Maria G Sande, Nuno Azoia, Ligia R Rodrigues, Carla Joana Silva

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Detection of microplastics in the human penis.International journal of impotence research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Can Superhydrophobic PET Surfaces Prevent Bacterial Adhesion?Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tugçe ÇaykaraCENTI-Center for Nanotechnology and Smart Materials, Rua Fernando Mesquita 278, 4760-034, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
Maria G SandeCEB-Centre of Biological Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Nuno AzoiaCENTI-Center for Nanotechnology and Smart Materials, Rua Fernando Mesquita 278, 4760-034, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal.
Ligia R RodriguesCEB-Centre of Biological Engineering, Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Carla Joana SilvaCENTI-Center for Nanotechnology and Smart Materials, Rua Fernando Mesquita 278, 4760-034, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Portugal. csilva@centi.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7509-9135
CeNTI (Portugal) · PTUniversity of Minho · PT

Funding

European Regional Development Fund NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004FITEC CeNTI'25 - Programa InterfaceFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/BIO/04469/2019H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 765042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is one of the most used polymeric materials in the health care sector mainly due to its advantages that include biocompatibility, high uniformity, mechanical strength and resistance against chemicals and/or abrasion. However, avoiding bacterial contamination on PET is still an unsolved challenge and two main strategies are being explored to overcome this drawback: the anti-adhesive and biocidal modification of PET surface. While bacterial adhesion depends on several surface properties namely surface charge and energy, hydrophilicity and surface roughness, a biocidal effect can be obtained by antimicrobial compounds attached to the surface to inhibit the growth of bacteria (bacteriostatic) or kill bacteria (bactericidal). Therefore, it is well known that granting antibacterial properties to PET surface would be beneficial in the prevention of infectious diseases. Different modification methods have been reported for such purpose. This review addresses some of the strategies that have been attempted to prevent or reduce the bacterial contamination on PET surfaces, including functionalisation, grafting, topographical surface modification and coating. Those strategies, particularly the grafting method seems to be very promising for healthcare applications to prevent infectious diseases and the emergence of bacteria resistance.

Indexed as

Bacterial AdhesionSurface PropertiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleHumansPolyethylene TerephthalatesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePolyethylene TerephthalatesAntibacterial propertiesBacteria adhesionCoatingGraftingPolyethylene terephthalateSurface functionalisationTopographical modificationWater contact angle

Identifiers

PMID32037497
PMCPMC7248016
OpenAlexW3004878604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.