Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32037466›Full record

Trial reportAbdominal radiology (New York)2020

Observer agreement for small bowel ultrasound in Crohn's disease: results from the METRIC trial.

Gauraang Bhatnagar, Laura Quinn, Antony Higginson, Andrew Plumb, Steve Halligan, Damian Tolan, Roger Lapham, Susan Mallett, Stuart A Taylor, METRIC study investigators

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gauraang BhatnagarCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Laura QuinnInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Antony HigginsonDepartment of Radiology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Andrew PlumbCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Steve HalliganCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Damian TolanDepartment of Radiology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Roger LaphamDepartment of Radiology, St James' University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Susan MallettInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Stuart A TaylorCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK. stuart.taylor@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6765-8806
METRIC study investigators

Funding

Department of Health 11/23/01Department of Health NIHR300606Department of Health PDF-2017-10-081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo prospectively evaluate interobserver agreement for small bowel ultrasound (SBUS) in newly diagnosed and relapsing Crohn's disease.

methodsA subset of patients recruited to a prospective trial comparing the diagnostic accuracy of MR enterography and SBUS underwent a second SBUS performed by one of a pool of six practitioners, who recorded the presence, activity and location of small bowel and colonic disease. Detailed segmental mural and extra-mural observations were also scored. Interobserver variability was expressed as percentage agreement with a construct reference standard, split by patient cohort, grouping disease as present or absent. Prevalence adjusted bias adjusted kappa (PABAK), and simple percentage agreement between practitioners, irrespective of the reference standard, were calculated.

resultsThirty-eight patients (11 new diagnosis, 27 relapse) were recruited from two sites. Overall percentage agreement for small bowel disease presence against the consensus reference was 82% (52-95% (95%CI)), kappa coefficient (κ) 0.64, (substantial agreement) for new diagnosis and 81%, κ 0.63 (substantial agreement) for the relapsing cohort. Agreement for colonic disease presence was 64%, κ 0.27 (fair agreement) in new diagnosis and 78%,κ 0.56 (moderate agreement) in the relapsing cohort. Simple agreement between practitioners was 84% and 87% for small bowel and colonic disease presence respectively. Practitioners agreed on small bowel disease activity in 24/27 (89%) where both identified disease. Kappa agreement for detailed mural observations ranged from κ 0.00 to 1.00.

conclusionThere is substantial practitioner agreement for small bowel disease presence in newly diagnosed and relapsing CD patients, supporting wider dissemination of enteric US.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseUltrasonographyHumansIntestine, SmallMagnetic Resonance ImagingObserver VariationProspective StudiesCrohn diseaseObserver variationProspective studiesUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID32037466
PMCPMC7455580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.