Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32036971›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Analysis of the physical meat quality in partridge (Alectoris chukar) and its relationship with intramuscular fat.

Yaya Wen, Honghua Liu, Ke Liu, Haiyue Cao, Haiguang Mao, Xinyang Dong, Zhaozheng Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Inhibition ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaya WenCollege of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Honghua LiuCollege of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Ke LiuCollege of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Haiyue CaoCollege of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Haiguang MaoCollege of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Xinyang DongCollege of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Zhaozheng YinCollege of Animal Science, Zhejiang University, Zijingang Campus, Hangzhou 310058, China. Electronic address: yzhzh@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

Investigation of metabolites related to manganese exposureF31ES027304 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BAKER, MARISSA GAYL · 2016 to 2017
$61k
NIEHS NIH HHS 27304C2054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the effect of various levels of intramuscular fat (IMF: <0.5%, 0.5-0.99%, 1.0-1.49%, 1.5-1.99%, 2.0-2.49%, and >2.5%) on the physical meat quality of partridge. Physical characteristics such as moisture, pH, shear force, water-holding capacity (WHC), and color, along with IMF, were measured on 414 partridges (pectoral muscle). In this study, partridge meat was described as a kind of tender and moderately juicy meat with a nice color. Additionally, tenderness was significantly different between IMF < 0.5% and IMF > 0.5% levels (P < 0.01). IMF >0.5% also obtained higher value of WHC than IMF <0.5% although the difference was statistically nonsignificant. IMF levels did not affect pH or color. The results showed that IMF content was not significantly correlated with physical meat quality. However, in terms of eating experience, the minimum IMF level for better meat quality for consumer was 0.5%. Pearson correlation coefficients indicated that IMF content had significant negative correlations with moisture content but not with pH (r = -0.066), shear force (r = -0.072), WHC (r = 0.085), or color (L*(r = -0.049), a*(r = -0.028) and b*(r = 0.045)). Besides, meat pH had significant negative correlations with WHC (r = -0.036; P < 0.01) and lightness (L*) (r = -0.292; P < 0.01). Consequently, we consider pH to be one of the most important factors in evaluating meat quality of partridge.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueQuailAnimalsColorHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMeatMuscle, SkeletalShear StrengthWaterWaterIMFmeat qualitypartridgeshear forceWHC

Identifiers

PMID32036971
PMCPMC7587618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.