ArticlePoultry science2020
Investigation of the impact of gut microbiotas on fertility of stored sperm by types of hens.
Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep culturing the fecal microbiota of healthy laying hens.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Bidirectional Mendelian randomization to explore the causal relationships between the gut microbiota and male reproductive diseases.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Elevated testicular apoptosis is associated with elevated sphingosine driven by gut microbiota in prediabetic sheep.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Microbial composition of egg component and its association with hatchability of laying hens.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Early life microbiota transplantation from highly feed-efficient broiler improved weight gain by reshaping the gut microbiota in laying chicken.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to the practical interest in understanding duration of fertility (DF) to reduce the cost of producing hatching eggs by decreasing the frequency of artificial insemination, as well to uncover the mechanism of the estrogen-gut microbiome axis, elucidating the interaction between the maternal microbiome and the function of sperm storage tubules (SST) has become important for revealing the DF in laying hens. In this study, we investigated the compositional, structural, and functional differences in gut microbiomes between hens with high (HSST, n = 8) and low SST activity (LSST, n = 10) by performing phenotypic selection from approximately 400 individual hens based on their DFs. Their cecal microbial communities were analyzed by sequencing the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbiome abundance estimators from the ceca of HSST and LSST hens were not significantly different at the phylum and genus taxonomic levels, although the relative abundances for the phylum Firmicutes and the genus Lactobacillus were higher in the HSST group. Furthermore, some taxonomic levels of bacteria expressing the components of several metabolic pathways differed between the HSST and LSST groups. Moreover, predicting functional microbiomes by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) revealed that certain pathways, such as the metabolism of carbohydrates and protein, cellular processes, and organismal systems, of the HSST group exhibited higher expression of genes associated with bioactivity and energy biosynthesis than those in the LSST group. Our results may provide insights into hen-microbe interactions with respect to DF and will be useful in establishing a strategy for new research to uncover the functional regulation of SST in laying hens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.