ReviewJournal of endocrinological investigation2020
5α-Reductase-2 deficiency: is gender assignment recommended in infancy? Two case-reports and review of the literature.
Review in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- XYGO: proposing a new holistic measure of gender identity and sexual orientation.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Changes in the clinical management of 5α-reductase type 2 and 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiencies in France.Endocrine connections · 2023Article
- A Novel Compound Heterozygous Mutation of HSD17B3 Gene Identified in a Patient With 46,XY Difference of Sexual Development.Sexual medicine · 2022Article
- Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8.International journal of transgender health · 2022Article
- Disorders/Differences of Sex Development Presenting in the Newborn With 46,XY Karyotype.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 3 deficiency: female sex assignment and follow-up.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGender assignment represents one of the most controversial aspects of the clinical management of individuals with Differences of Sex Development, including 5α-Reductase-2 deficiency (SRD5A2). Given the predominant female appearance of external genitalia in individuals with SRD5A2 deficiency, most of them were assigned to the female sex at birth. However, in the last years the high rate of gender role shift from female to male led to recommend a male gender assignment.
methodsWe here describe two cases of subjects with SRD5A2 deficiency assigned as females at birth, reporting their clinical histories and psychometric evaluations (Body Uneasiness Test, Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale, Bem Sex-Role Inventory, Female Sexual Distress Scale Revised, visual analogue scale for gender identity and sexual orientation) performed at the time of referral at the Florence Gender Clinic.
resultsBoth patients underwent early surgical interventions without being included in the decision-making process. They had to conform to a binary feminine gender role because of social/familiar pressure, with a significant impact on their psychological well-being. Psychometric evaluations identified clinically significant body uneasiness and gender incongruence in both subjects. No sexually related distress and undifferentiated gender role resulted in the first subject and sexually related distress and androgynous gender role resulted in the second subject.
conclusionsThe reported cases suggest the possibility to consider a new approach for gender assignment in these individuals, involving them directly in the decision-making process and allowing them to explore their gender identity, also with the help of GnRH analogues to delay pubertal modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.