Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32036547›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2020

"It's like heaven over there": medicine as discipline and the production of the carceral body.

Jason E Glenn, Alina M Bennett, Rebecca J Hester, Nadeem N Tajuddin, Ahmar Hashmi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Unlocking Silent Suffering: Addressing the Otorhinolaryngologic Needs of Incarcerated Persons Through Carceral Health Education.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2023
    Article
  6. Stakeholder-engaged research is necessary across the criminal-legal spectrum.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jason E GlennDepartment of History and Philosophy of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA. jglenn4@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6191-4362
Alina M BennettRegional Ethicist, Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, Oakland, CA, 94612, USA.
Rebecca J HesterDepartment of Science, Technology and Society, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Nadeem N TajuddinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Ahmar HashmiDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50220, Thailand.
Baylor College of Medicine · USKaiser Permanente · USMahidol University · THUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrectional systems in several U.S. states have entered into partnerships with Academic Medical Centers (AMCs) to provide healthcare for people who are incarcerated. This project was initiated to better understand medical trainee perspectives on training and providing healthcare services to prison populations at one AMC specializing in the care of incarcerated patients: The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (UTMB). We set out to characterize the attitudes and perceptions of medical trainees from the start of their training until the final year of Internal Medicine residency. Our goal was to analyze medical trainee perspectives on caring for incarcerated patients and to determine what specialized education and training is needed, if any, for the provision of ethical and appropriate healthcare to incarcerated patients.

resultsWe found that medical trainees grapple with being beneficiaries of a state and institutional power structure that exploits the neglected health of incarcerated patients for the benefit of medical education and research. The benefits include the training opportunities afforded by the advanced pathologies suffered by persons who are incarcerated, an institutional culture that generally allowed students more freedom to practice their skills on incarcerated patients as compared to free-world patients, and an easy compliance of incarcerated patients likely conditioned by their neglect. Most trainees failed to recognize the extreme power differential between provider and patient that facilitates such freedom.

conclusionsUsing a critical prison studies/Foucauldian theoretical framework, we identified how the provision/withholding of healthcare to and from persons who are incarcerated plays a major role in disciplining incarcerated bodies into becoming compliant medical patients and research subjects, complacent with and even grateful for delayed care, delivered sometimes below the standard best practices. Specialized vulnerable-population training is sorely needed for both medical trainees and attending physicians in order to not further contribute to this exploitation of incarcerated patients.

Indexed as

Academic medical centersCorrectional managed careCritical prison studiesIncarcerated patientsIncarcerationMedical residentsMedical studentsPrisoners

Identifiers

PMID32036547
PMCPMC7007681
OpenAlexW3012638670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.