Health and Social Care Diversity Among Individuals with Longstanding Physical and Psychological Health Problems: Pooled Repeated Cross Sectional Analyses.

Corine Driessens, David Kingdon, David Pilgrim, Peter W F Smith

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Community mental health journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Corine DriessensFaculty of Medicine, Clinical and Experimental Science; Room 83 Level F, South Academic Block, Southampton General Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, England, UK. c.m.driessens@soton.ac.uk.

David KingdonDepartment of Psychiatry Academic Centre, University of Southampton, College Keep Room 123, 4 - 12 Terminus Terrace, Southampton, SO14 3DT, England, UK.

David PilgrimDepartment of Clinical Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England, UK.

Peter W F SmithDepartment of Social Statistics & Demography - Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Building 39 Room 2009, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, England, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines differences in health-and-social care utilisation for individuals with physical and/or mental health problems. Logistic regression models are used to determine disparity in the percentage of General Household/Lifestyle Survey participants with physical compared to mental health problems receiving disability benefits or health care services between 2000 and 2011. Our findings of a relative underutilisation of secondary health care combined with a relative overutilization of out-of-work benefits by individuals with mental health problems is novel to the field of rehabilitative health care. These results provide evidence for the previously suspected disparity in health care utilisation of individuals with mental health problems and indicate problems in labour force integration. The findings support the political call for a 'parity of esteem', which, in Britain, was enshrined in the Health and Social Care Act of 2012.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPersons with DisabilitiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial SupportGeneral household surveyGeneral lifestyle surveyHealth careMental health problemsParity of esteemSocial care

Identifiers

PMID32036518

DOI10.1007/s10597-020-00566-y

PMCPMC7250952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.