ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2020
In vivo safety assessment of a bio-inspired bone adhesive.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnesium-organophosphate bone adhesives repurposed as endodontic cements for dental applications.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Performance and Handling of Mineral-Organic Adhesive Bone Cements Based on Magnesium Under Clinical Test Conditions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation of a Bio-Inspired Adhesive for Bone Fixation.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Bone adhesive materials: From bench to bedside.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Novel adhesive mineral-organic bone cements based on phosphoserine and magnesium phosphates or oxides.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2023Article
- CanineFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Biodegradable and Biocompatible Adhesives for the Effective Stabilisation, Repair and Regeneration of Bone.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Cytocompatibility and Bioactive Ion Release Profiles of Phosphoserine Bone Adhesive: Bridge from In Vitro to In Vivo.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Gluing Living Bone Using a Biomimetic Bioadhesive: From Initial Cut to Final Healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
A new class of materials, bone adhesives, could revolutionise the treatment of highly fragmented fractures. We present the first biological safety investigation of a bio-inspired bone adhesive. The formulation was based upon a modified calcium phosphate cement that included the amino acid phosphoserine. This material has recently been described as substantially stronger than other bioresorbable calcium phosphate cements. Four adhesive groups with the active substance (phosphoserine) and two control groups without phosphoserine were selected for in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility testing. The test groups were subject for cell viability assay and subcutaneous implantation in rats that was followed by gene expression analysis and histology assessment after 6 and 12 weeks. All adhesive groups supported the same rate of cell proliferation compared to the α-TCP control and had viability between 45-64% when compared to cell control. There was no evidence of an increased immune response or ectopic bone formation in vivo. To conclude, this bio-inspired bone adhesive has been proven to be safe, in the present study, without any harmful effects on the surrounding soft tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.